Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 165.2 | 145.9 | 129.5 | 118.7 | 111.9 | 102.5 | 99.7 | 80.8 | 75.9 | 58.8 | 55.5 | 55.0 |
Cluster size | 263 | 239 | 227 | 205 | 178 | 159 | 173 | 132 | 116 | 104 | 110 | 94 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.7 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 4.35 | 4.51 | 4.57 | 4.20 | 4.63 | 4.67 | 4.43 | 4.11 | 4.68 | 4.14 | 3.71 | 3.80 |
GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.65 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.35 | 2.52 | 2.97 | 2.35 | 3.00 | 2.64 | 2.38 | 2.55 | 3.32 | 3.05 | 2.76 |
2 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 2.67 | 2.18 | 2.49 | 2.12 | 2.49 | 2.41 | 2.95 | 3.05 | 2.99 |
3 | 2.52 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 2.35 | 2.38 | 2.26 | 2.05 | 2.31 | 2.07 | 2.99 | 2.98 | 2.72 |
4 | 2.97 | 2.67 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 3.02 | 2.19 | 2.24 | 2.65 | 2.17 | 3.12 | 2.93 | 2.44 |
5 | 2.35 | 2.18 | 2.38 | 3.02 | 0.00 | 2.71 | 2.30 | 2.27 | 2.28 | 3.11 | 3.30 | 2.91 |
6 | 3.00 | 2.49 | 2.26 | 2.19 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 2.69 | 2.29 | 2.77 | 3.21 | 2.93 |
7 | 2.64 | 2.12 | 2.05 | 2.24 | 2.30 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 2.03 | 2.82 | 3.08 | 2.76 |
8 | 2.38 | 2.49 | 2.31 | 2.65 | 2.27 | 2.69 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 2.37 | 2.70 | 3.07 | 2.57 |
9 | 2.55 | 2.41 | 2.07 | 2.17 | 2.28 | 2.29 | 2.03 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 3.21 | 3.25 | 2.67 |
10 | 3.32 | 2.95 | 2.99 | 3.12 | 3.11 | 2.77 | 2.82 | 2.70 | 3.21 | 0.00 | 3.39 | 3.01 |
11 | 3.05 | 3.05 | 2.98 | 2.93 | 3.30 | 3.21 | 3.08 | 3.07 | 3.25 | 3.39 | 0.00 | 2.71 |
12 | 2.76 | 2.99 | 2.72 | 2.44 | 2.91 | 2.93 | 2.76 | 2.57 | 2.67 | 3.01 | 2.71 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
2 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.65 |
3 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.67 |
4 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
5 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
6 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.68 |
7 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.70 |
8 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
9 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
10 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
11 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.70 |
12 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013