Project Name | glutamin |
Project Name | glutamin |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 180.4 | 168.5 | 166.4 | 157.7 | 153.9 | 148.7 | 135.6 | 118.0 | 71.7 | 71.4 | 63.9 | 63.6 |
Cluster size | 235 | 235 | 224 | 212 | 222 | 211 | 179 | 147 | 84 | 86 | 81 | 84 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.41 | 2.56 | 2.44 | 2.80 | 2.48 | 2.57 | 2.37 | 5.48 | 2.58 | 2.68 | 2.55 | 2.39 |
GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.71 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.33 | 2.71 | 2.26 | 2.32 | 2.69 | 5.67 | 2.05 | 1.95 | 2.34 | 2.85 |
2 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 2.03 | 2.22 | 1.89 | 2.37 | 5.15 | 2.53 | 2.31 | 2.29 | 2.42 |
3 | 2.33 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 2.17 | 2.05 | 2.41 | 5.36 | 2.53 | 2.47 | 2.37 | 2.53 |
4 | 2.71 | 2.03 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 2.05 | 2.53 | 4.90 | 2.54 | 2.78 | 2.65 | 2.67 |
5 | 2.26 | 2.22 | 2.17 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 2.39 | 5.39 | 2.44 | 2.31 | 2.42 | 2.58 |
6 | 2.32 | 1.89 | 2.05 | 2.05 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 2.37 | 5.08 | 2.57 | 2.38 | 2.41 | 2.38 |
7 | 2.69 | 2.37 | 2.41 | 2.53 | 2.39 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 5.32 | 2.71 | 2.77 | 2.65 | 1.98 |
8 | 5.67 | 5.15 | 5.36 | 4.90 | 5.39 | 5.08 | 5.32 | 0.00 | 5.76 | 6.01 | 5.50 | 5.44 |
9 | 2.05 | 2.53 | 2.53 | 2.54 | 2.44 | 2.57 | 2.71 | 5.76 | 0.00 | 2.31 | 2.62 | 3.01 |
10 | 1.95 | 2.31 | 2.47 | 2.78 | 2.31 | 2.38 | 2.77 | 6.01 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.94 |
11 | 2.34 | 2.29 | 2.37 | 2.65 | 2.42 | 2.41 | 2.65 | 5.50 | 2.62 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.69 |
12 | 2.85 | 2.42 | 2.53 | 2.67 | 2.58 | 2.38 | 1.98 | 5.44 | 3.01 | 2.94 | 2.69 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.64 |
2 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
3 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
4 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.70 |
5 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.67 |
6 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.68 |
7 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.77 |
8 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.65 |
9 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.65 |
10 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.64 |
11 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
12 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013