Project Name | kowsh_TRP-Cage |
Project Name | kowsh_TRP-Cage |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 239.1 | 208.6 | 196.9 | 174.9 | 155.6 | 148.5 | 138.6 | 137.6 | 114.8 | 96.1 | 73.3 | 67.2 |
Cluster size | 257 | 239 | 207 | 200 | 171 | 163 | 163 | 156 | 146 | 119 | 96 | 83 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 1.42 | 1.35 | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.42 | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.26 | 1.19 | 1.48 | 1.73 | 1.94 |
GDT_TS | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.80 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 1.16 | 0.97 | 1.19 | 1.22 | 1.02 | 1.34 | 1.49 | 2.06 |
2 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 | 1.17 | 1.50 | 0.88 | 1.12 | 1.16 | 0.76 | 0.91 | 1.49 | 1.80 |
3 | 0.95 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 1.67 | 0.97 | 1.60 | 1.52 | 1.21 | 1.06 | 1.63 | 2.24 |
4 | 0.91 | 1.17 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.61 | 1.19 | 1.39 | 1.62 | 1.26 | 1.37 | 1.69 | 2.36 |
5 | 1.16 | 1.50 | 1.67 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.39 | 1.31 | 1.22 | 1.31 | 1.88 | 1.72 | 2.14 |
6 | 0.97 | 0.88 | 0.97 | 1.19 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 1.20 | 1.14 | 0.98 | 1.10 | 1.53 | 1.97 |
7 | 1.19 | 1.12 | 1.60 | 1.39 | 1.31 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.43 | 1.12 | 1.52 | 1.62 | 2.07 |
8 | 1.22 | 1.16 | 1.52 | 1.62 | 1.22 | 1.14 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.07 | 1.28 | 1.61 | 1.74 |
9 | 1.02 | 0.76 | 1.21 | 1.26 | 1.31 | 0.98 | 1.12 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.11 | 1.40 | 1.70 |
10 | 1.34 | 0.91 | 1.06 | 1.37 | 1.88 | 1.10 | 1.52 | 1.28 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.66 | 1.94 |
11 | 1.49 | 1.49 | 1.63 | 1.69 | 1.72 | 1.53 | 1.62 | 1.61 | 1.40 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
12 | 2.06 | 1.80 | 2.24 | 2.36 | 2.14 | 1.97 | 2.07 | 1.74 | 1.70 | 1.94 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.83 |
2 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
3 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.80 |
4 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.83 |
5 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.81 |
6 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.84 |
7 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.82 |
8 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.83 |
9 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.86 |
10 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.83 |
11 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.89 |
12 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013