Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 470.7 | 450.8 | 389.6 | 309.1 | 72.5 | 65.6 | 61.5 | 59.0 | 28.3 | 10.9 | 7.7 | 2.9 |
Cluster size | 445 | 418 | 350 | 310 | 97 | 100 | 80 | 95 | 55 | 28 | 15 | 7 |
Average cluster RMSD | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 2.4 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 10.00 | 9.95 | 10.20 | 9.98 | 9.73 | 9.62 | 10.10 | 10.30 | 11.50 | 8.59 | 10.90 | 8.70 |
GDT_TS | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.31 | 0.43 | 0.40 | 0.37 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 0.92 | 1.53 | 1.87 | 1.64 | 3.12 | 2.73 | 4.75 | 2.54 |
2 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 1.05 | 1.22 | 1.65 | 1.83 | 3.24 | 2.61 | 4.79 | 2.62 |
3 | 0.94 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 1.35 | 1.33 | 1.62 | 1.75 | 3.05 | 2.76 | 4.53 | 2.84 |
4 | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.89 | 1.57 | 1.85 | 1.65 | 3.10 | 2.68 | 4.88 | 2.48 |
5 | 0.92 | 1.05 | 1.35 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 1.90 | 1.78 | 3.50 | 2.77 | 5.02 | 2.01 |
6 | 1.53 | 1.22 | 1.33 | 1.57 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.55 | 2.13 | 3.51 | 2.46 | 4.47 | 2.90 |
7 | 1.87 | 1.65 | 1.62 | 1.85 | 1.90 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 2.37 | 3.35 | 3.15 | 4.18 | 3.11 |
8 | 1.64 | 1.83 | 1.75 | 1.65 | 1.78 | 2.13 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 3.06 | 3.24 | 5.10 | 2.97 |
9 | 3.12 | 3.24 | 3.05 | 3.10 | 3.50 | 3.51 | 3.35 | 3.06 | 0.00 | 4.38 | 4.62 | 4.62 |
10 | 2.73 | 2.61 | 2.76 | 2.68 | 2.77 | 2.46 | 3.15 | 3.24 | 4.38 | 0.00 | 5.44 | 3.34 |
11 | 4.75 | 4.79 | 4.53 | 4.88 | 5.02 | 4.47 | 4.18 | 5.10 | 4.62 | 5.44 | 0.00 | 5.21 |
12 | 2.54 | 2.62 | 2.84 | 2.48 | 2.01 | 2.90 | 3.11 | 2.97 | 4.62 | 3.34 | 5.21 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.68 | 0.85 |
2 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.69 | 0.81 |
3 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 0.81 |
4 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.66 | 0.84 |
5 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.66 | 0.85 |
6 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.69 | 0.79 |
7 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.78 |
8 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.63 | 0.79 |
9 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 0.76 |
10 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
11 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.53 |
12 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.53 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013