Project Name | 1a2p |
Project Name | 1a2p |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 184.0 | 148.1 | 138.1 | 121.0 | 117.4 | 116.7 | 106.7 | 89.0 | 79.2 | 69.1 | 56.7 | 45.4 |
Cluster size | 297 | 231 | 230 | 192 | 178 | 190 | 166 | 140 | 124 | 114 | 75 | 63 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.56 | 2.53 | 2.72 | 2.41 | 2.72 | 2.47 | 2.49 | 2.77 | 2.70 | 2.96 | 3.07 | 2.57 |
GDT_TS | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.70 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 1.61 | 1.96 | 1.79 | 1.84 | 2.13 | 2.19 | 2.64 | 2.57 | 2.39 | 2.29 |
2 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 1.70 | 1.75 | 2.19 | 1.81 | 2.22 | 2.65 | 2.54 | 2.27 | 2.01 |
3 | 1.61 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 2.04 | 2.09 | 2.36 | 2.22 | 2.72 | 2.84 | 2.54 | 2.46 |
4 | 1.96 | 1.70 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 1.63 | 2.26 | 1.86 | 2.09 | 2.59 | 2.71 | 2.50 | 1.96 |
5 | 1.79 | 1.75 | 2.04 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 2.39 | 2.19 | 2.10 | 2.79 | 2.83 | 2.56 | 1.94 |
6 | 1.84 | 2.19 | 2.09 | 2.26 | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 2.56 | 2.58 | 2.72 | 2.37 | 2.45 |
7 | 2.13 | 1.81 | 2.36 | 1.86 | 2.19 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 3.05 | 2.58 | 2.16 | 2.57 |
8 | 2.19 | 2.22 | 2.22 | 2.09 | 2.10 | 2.56 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 2.88 | 2.78 | 2.34 |
9 | 2.64 | 2.65 | 2.72 | 2.59 | 2.79 | 2.58 | 3.05 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 3.18 | 2.46 |
10 | 2.57 | 2.54 | 2.84 | 2.71 | 2.83 | 2.72 | 2.58 | 2.88 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 3.11 |
11 | 2.39 | 2.27 | 2.54 | 2.50 | 2.56 | 2.37 | 2.16 | 2.78 | 3.18 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 2.81 |
12 | 2.29 | 2.01 | 2.46 | 1.96 | 1.94 | 2.45 | 2.57 | 2.34 | 2.46 | 3.11 | 2.81 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.76 |
3 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
4 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.77 |
5 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.76 |
6 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
7 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
8 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.73 |
9 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.74 |
10 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
11 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
12 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013