Project Name | b |
Project Name | b |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 226.4 | 208.2 | 158.8 | 153.3 | 133.3 | 100.3 | 98.4 | 84.6 | 61.9 | 61.2 | 59.5 | 56.8 |
Cluster size | 329 | 304 | 220 | 218 | 184 | 132 | 150 | 141 | 88 | 79 | 81 | 74 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.47 | 3.08 | 4.02 | 2.93 | 3.29 | 3.04 | 3.86 | 2.80 | 3.57 | 4.24 | 3.94 | 3.29 |
GDT_TS | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.61 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 3.15 | 2.40 | 2.60 | 2.31 | 2.63 | 3.05 | 3.13 | 2.62 | 2.41 | 3.14 |
2 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 3.70 | 2.74 | 3.22 | 3.02 | 3.04 | 2.34 | 2.60 | 3.66 | 2.83 | 2.28 |
3 | 3.15 | 3.70 | 0.00 | 3.46 | 2.73 | 3.57 | 2.40 | 3.79 | 4.58 | 4.47 | 3.24 | 4.55 |
4 | 2.40 | 2.74 | 3.46 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 2.03 | 3.05 | 2.93 | 3.30 | 3.26 | 2.84 | 2.97 |
5 | 2.60 | 3.22 | 2.73 | 2.86 | 0.00 | 2.59 | 2.88 | 3.35 | 4.05 | 3.67 | 3.19 | 3.89 |
6 | 2.31 | 3.02 | 3.57 | 2.03 | 2.59 | 0.00 | 3.26 | 3.18 | 3.48 | 3.09 | 3.20 | 3.27 |
7 | 2.63 | 3.04 | 2.40 | 3.05 | 2.88 | 3.26 | 0.00 | 3.30 | 3.78 | 3.67 | 2.35 | 3.74 |
8 | 3.05 | 2.34 | 3.79 | 2.93 | 3.35 | 3.18 | 3.30 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 3.85 | 3.19 | 2.52 |
9 | 3.13 | 2.60 | 4.58 | 3.30 | 4.05 | 3.48 | 3.78 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 3.36 | 3.32 | 2.07 |
10 | 2.62 | 3.66 | 4.47 | 3.26 | 3.67 | 3.09 | 3.67 | 3.85 | 3.36 | 0.00 | 3.14 | 3.39 |
11 | 2.41 | 2.83 | 3.24 | 2.84 | 3.19 | 3.20 | 2.35 | 3.19 | 3.32 | 3.14 | 0.00 | 3.21 |
12 | 3.14 | 2.28 | 4.55 | 2.97 | 3.89 | 3.27 | 3.74 | 2.52 | 2.07 | 3.39 | 3.21 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.73 |
3 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.60 |
4 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.71 |
5 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.59 |
6 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.67 |
7 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.60 |
8 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.71 |
9 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.79 |
10 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.69 |
11 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.62 |
12 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013