Project Name | 97 |
Project Name | 97 |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 226.3 | 208.5 | 205.1 | 148.0 | 121.5 | 120.7 | 95.4 | 91.1 | 85.8 | 78.0 | 71.6 | 60.8 |
Cluster size | 303 | 289 | 276 | 206 | 165 | 146 | 139 | 121 | 98 | 94 | 90 | 73 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.66 | 2.51 | 2.40 | 2.60 | 2.36 | 2.70 | 2.29 | 2.49 | 2.44 | 2.67 | 2.41 | 2.76 |
GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 2.54 | 2.80 | 2.67 | 2.79 | 2.33 | 2.19 | 2.65 | 2.37 | 2.44 | 2.81 |
2 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 2.90 | 2.30 | 2.94 | 2.43 | 2.22 | 2.44 | 2.56 | 2.09 | 2.62 |
3 | 2.54 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 2.37 | 2.65 | 2.44 | 2.31 | 2.27 | 2.32 | 1.98 | 2.47 |
4 | 2.80 | 2.90 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 1.97 | 2.47 | 2.72 | 2.93 | 2.74 | 2.82 | 2.70 |
5 | 2.67 | 2.30 | 2.37 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 2.84 | 2.53 | 2.33 | 2.83 | 2.89 | 2.52 | 3.11 |
6 | 2.79 | 2.94 | 2.65 | 1.97 | 2.84 | 0.00 | 2.37 | 2.49 | 2.88 | 2.58 | 2.93 | 2.80 |
7 | 2.33 | 2.43 | 2.44 | 2.47 | 2.53 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 2.47 | 2.43 | 2.40 | 2.58 |
8 | 2.19 | 2.22 | 2.31 | 2.72 | 2.33 | 2.49 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.35 | 2.47 | 2.63 |
9 | 2.65 | 2.44 | 2.27 | 2.93 | 2.83 | 2.88 | 2.47 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 2.06 | 2.17 | 2.28 |
10 | 2.37 | 2.56 | 2.32 | 2.74 | 2.89 | 2.58 | 2.43 | 2.35 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.56 |
11 | 2.44 | 2.09 | 1.98 | 2.82 | 2.52 | 2.93 | 2.40 | 2.47 | 2.17 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.46 |
12 | 2.81 | 2.62 | 2.47 | 2.70 | 3.11 | 2.80 | 2.58 | 2.63 | 2.28 | 2.56 | 2.46 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
3 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.73 |
4 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.72 |
5 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.67 |
6 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.72 |
7 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
8 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.71 |
9 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.78 |
10 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
11 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
12 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013