Project Name | Lalitha |
Project Name | Lalitha |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 167.8 | 148.4 | 144.8 | 139.7 | 120.8 | 110.4 | 100.3 | 80.7 | 79.4 | 68.6 | 62.2 | 57.6 |
Cluster size | 285 | 274 | 204 | 233 | 189 | 148 | 165 | 111 | 125 | 89 | 99 | 78 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 7.17 | 7.05 | 5.74 | 8.03 | 6.72 | 5.66 | 5.39 | 4.58 | 4.48 | 4.23 | 5.96 | 5.40 |
GDT_TS | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.48 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 5.66 | 3.38 | 4.10 | 5.47 | 5.45 | 6.25 | 7.43 | 6.62 | 5.09 | 5.22 |
2 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 5.62 | 2.74 | 3.10 | 5.16 | 4.69 | 5.68 | 7.38 | 6.32 | 4.22 | 5.12 |
3 | 5.66 | 5.62 | 0.00 | 6.00 | 4.95 | 1.84 | 3.45 | 3.94 | 5.12 | 4.25 | 4.00 | 2.69 |
4 | 3.38 | 2.74 | 6.00 | 0.00 | 3.53 | 5.55 | 5.59 | 6.51 | 8.26 | 7.04 | 4.76 | 5.69 |
5 | 4.10 | 3.10 | 4.95 | 3.53 | 0.00 | 4.41 | 4.03 | 4.97 | 7.15 | 5.85 | 2.93 | 4.30 |
6 | 5.47 | 5.16 | 1.84 | 5.55 | 4.41 | 0.00 | 2.84 | 3.56 | 5.03 | 3.98 | 3.51 | 2.80 |
7 | 5.45 | 4.69 | 3.45 | 5.59 | 4.03 | 2.84 | 0.00 | 3.13 | 4.81 | 3.72 | 3.10 | 3.46 |
8 | 6.25 | 5.68 | 3.94 | 6.51 | 4.97 | 3.56 | 3.13 | 0.00 | 4.05 | 2.45 | 3.85 | 3.79 |
9 | 7.43 | 7.38 | 5.12 | 8.26 | 7.15 | 5.03 | 4.81 | 4.05 | 0.00 | 2.65 | 5.93 | 5.15 |
10 | 6.62 | 6.32 | 4.25 | 7.04 | 5.85 | 3.98 | 3.72 | 2.45 | 2.65 | 0.00 | 4.59 | 4.26 |
11 | 5.09 | 4.22 | 4.00 | 4.76 | 2.93 | 3.51 | 3.10 | 3.85 | 5.93 | 4.59 | 0.00 | 3.23 |
12 | 5.22 | 5.12 | 2.69 | 5.69 | 4.30 | 2.80 | 3.46 | 3.79 | 5.15 | 4.26 | 3.23 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.55 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.59 |
2 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.57 |
3 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.77 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.72 |
4 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.65 | 0.55 |
5 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.51 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.70 | 0.56 |
6 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.77 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
7 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.62 |
8 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.59 |
9 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.51 | 0.50 |
10 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.56 |
11 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
12 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.72 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013