Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 291.3 | 191.4 | 176.8 | 166.8 | 166.0 | 154.6 | 141.3 | 135.6 | 88.3 | 72.7 | 47.0 | 43.7 |
Cluster size | 347 | 233 | 216 | 208 | 211 | 172 | 152 | 164 | 123 | 85 | 44 | 45 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.47 | 2.74 | 2.62 | 2.64 | 2.67 | 2.69 | 2.83 | 2.98 | 2.55 | 2.56 | 2.44 | 2.61 |
GDT_TS | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.73 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 1.85 | 2.51 | 2.33 | 1.83 | 2.32 | 2.31 | 2.19 | 2.27 | 2.32 | 2.03 |
2 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 1.73 | 2.75 | 2.54 | 2.18 | 2.30 | 2.23 | 2.26 | 2.72 | 2.31 | 1.87 |
3 | 1.85 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 2.74 | 2.43 | 2.27 | 2.30 | 2.20 | 2.42 | 2.49 | 2.33 | 2.06 |
4 | 2.51 | 2.75 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 1.81 | 2.49 | 2.49 | 2.42 | 1.96 | 2.02 | 2.01 | 2.43 |
5 | 2.33 | 2.54 | 2.43 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 2.09 | 2.00 | 1.48 | 1.93 | 1.69 | 2.11 |
6 | 1.83 | 2.18 | 2.27 | 2.49 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 2.45 | 2.25 | 2.27 | 2.34 | 2.19 |
7 | 2.32 | 2.30 | 2.30 | 2.49 | 2.09 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 1.79 | 2.25 | 2.56 | 2.48 | 2.02 |
8 | 2.31 | 2.23 | 2.20 | 2.42 | 2.00 | 2.45 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 2.57 | 2.32 | 1.86 |
9 | 2.19 | 2.26 | 2.42 | 1.96 | 1.48 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 1.76 | 2.04 |
10 | 2.27 | 2.72 | 2.49 | 2.02 | 1.93 | 2.27 | 2.56 | 2.57 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.42 |
11 | 2.32 | 2.31 | 2.33 | 2.01 | 1.69 | 2.34 | 2.48 | 2.32 | 1.76 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
12 | 2.03 | 1.87 | 2.06 | 2.43 | 2.11 | 2.19 | 2.02 | 1.86 | 2.04 | 2.42 | 1.89 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.76 |
2 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.77 |
3 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.76 |
4 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
5 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.76 |
6 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.74 |
7 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.78 |
8 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.80 |
9 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.76 |
10 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
11 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
12 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013