Project name: aggreleb

Status: done

submitted: 2019-02-03 20:42:20, status changed: 2019-02-03 23:01:19
Settings
Chain sequence(s) F: DQDCLPGWSSHEGHCYKVFNLDKTWEDAEKFCTEQANSGHLVSIDSKKEANFVAELVSQNIKETRRTDFVWIGLRAEDKRQHCSSEWSDGSSINYQNWIEAESKKCLGLEKQTRYRKWVNLNCGQPYRFTCEI
Distance of aggregation 10 Å
Dynamic mode Yes
Show buried residues

Minimal score value
-3.855
Maximal score value
1.1602
Average score
-1.0138
Total score value
-134.8375

The table below lists A3D score for protein residues. Residues with A3D score > 0.0000 are marked by yellow rows.

residue index residue name chain Aggrescan3D score mutation
residue index residue name chain Aggrescan3D score
mutation
1 D F -2.7587
2 Q F -2.5248
3 D F -2.6402
4 C F -1.1274
5 L F 0.2925
6 P F 0.3353
7 G F 0.4568
8 W F 1.1602
9 S F 0.0116
10 S F -0.4956
11 H F -1.1976
12 E F -2.3378
13 G F -1.6381
14 H F -1.1404
15 C F 0.0459
16 Y F 0.0000
17 K F 0.4947
18 V F 0.0000
19 F F 0.0000
20 N F -0.4073
21 L F -0.2813
22 D F -1.1614
23 K F -1.5037
24 T F -1.3407
25 W F -1.1101
26 E F -1.9914
27 D F -2.0308
28 A F 0.0000
29 E F -2.1079
30 K F -2.8494
31 F F -1.8242
32 C F 0.0000
33 T F -2.3168
34 E F -2.7928
35 Q F -1.8996
36 A F -1.4348
37 N F -1.8767
38 S F -1.2843
39 G F 0.0000
40 H F -1.2397
41 L F 0.0000
42 V F -0.4894
43 S F -0.6893
44 I F 0.0000
45 D F -2.5693
46 S F -2.6544
47 K F -3.4803
48 K F -3.1164
49 E F -2.4972
50 A F -2.2257
51 N F -1.7536
52 F F -0.3676
53 V F 0.0000
54 A F 0.0000
55 E F -0.9145
56 L F 0.0000
57 V F 0.0000
58 S F 0.0000
59 Q F -2.2471
60 N F 0.0000
61 I F 0.0000
62 K F -3.7172
63 E F -3.2663
64 T F -2.7219
65 R F -3.5433
66 R F -2.7474
67 T F -1.6849
68 D F -0.6207
69 F F -0.0489
70 V F 0.0000
71 W F 0.0000
72 I F 0.0000
73 G F -0.0828
74 L F 0.1455
75 R F -0.7274
76 A F -1.1108
77 E F -2.4320
78 D F -2.9421
79 K F -3.8483
80 R F -3.8550
81 Q F -2.6821
82 H F 0.0000
83 C F -0.0280
84 S F -0.2318
85 S F -0.2971
86 E F -0.8402
87 W F -0.1461
88 S F -0.9451
89 D F -1.9790
90 G F -1.7934
91 S F -1.2775
92 S F -0.4954
93 I F 0.3888
94 N F 0.0987
95 Y F 0.4657
96 Q F -0.6992
97 N F -1.4158
98 W F -0.2595
99 I F 0.8815
100 E F -1.5033
101 A F -1.6280
102 E F -2.4700
103 S F 0.0000
104 K F -1.7567
105 K F -1.4559
106 C F 0.0000
107 L F 0.0000
108 G F 0.0000
109 L F 0.0000
110 E F -1.3873
111 K F -1.7338
112 Q F -1.7778
113 T F -1.5299
114 R F -1.8282
115 Y F 0.0000
116 R F -2.6255
117 K F -1.8454
118 W F -0.3839
119 V F 0.0000
120 N F -0.2176
121 L F 0.0000
122 N F 0.0000
123 C F 0.0000
124 G F -1.1417
125 Q F -1.6183
126 P F -0.5235
127 Y F 0.4102
128 R F 0.0000
129 F F 0.0000
130 T F 0.0000
131 C F 0.0000
132 E F -0.6002
133 I F 0.7596

Above is the comparison between the input structure and the most aggregation prone model (predicted in the flexibility simulations, download both models in the PDB file format , download table with rmsd values ). The picture presents the most aggregation prone model (in blue) superimposed on the input structure (in red). The plot shows rmsd profile (distances between residues of the superimposed structures).

Dynamic mode uses CABS-flex simulations of protein structure fluctuations. The structure fluctuations may have impact on the size and extent of aggregation "hot-spots" on the protein surface. The dynamic mode uses the following pipeline: (1) based on the input structure, CABS-flex predicts a set of different models reflecting protein dynamics in solution; (2) for each of these models A3D score is calculated; (3) finally, the most aggregation prone model (the model with the highest A3D score, -1.0138 in this case) is selected and presented in A3D results.


 

Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers 2015