| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 215.3 | 151.2 | 132.5 | 130.8 | 110.3 | 102.0 | 100.4 | 100.1 | 84.5 | 77.9 | 63.6 | 24.3 |
| Cluster size | 317 | 225 | 222 | 205 | 158 | 170 | 159 | 152 | 128 | 130 | 102 | 32 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.09 | 2.92 | 2.64 | 2.43 | 3.25 | 2.53 | 2.71 | 2.96 | 3.30 | 2.50 | 2.39 | 2.87 |
| GDT_TS | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.91 | 2.36 | 2.99 | 2.28 | 3.08 | 2.69 | 1.66 | 2.35 | 2.40 | 2.32 | 3.23 |
| 2 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 2.95 | 1.84 | 2.77 | 2.37 | 2.04 | 2.14 | 2.34 | 2.32 | 3.02 |
| 3 | 2.36 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 2.76 | 2.12 | 2.45 | 2.27 | 2.52 | 1.85 | 1.90 | 2.58 |
| 4 | 2.99 | 2.95 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 3.33 | 2.05 | 2.58 | 2.82 | 3.04 | 2.51 | 2.12 | 2.64 |
| 5 | 2.28 | 1.84 | 2.76 | 3.33 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 2.99 | 2.32 | 2.38 | 2.90 | 2.77 | 3.47 |
| 6 | 3.08 | 2.77 | 2.12 | 2.05 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 2.43 | 3.06 | 2.94 | 2.23 | 2.03 | 2.37 |
| 7 | 2.69 | 2.37 | 2.45 | 2.58 | 2.99 | 2.43 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 2.67 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.68 |
| 8 | 1.66 | 2.04 | 2.27 | 2.82 | 2.32 | 3.06 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 2.37 | 2.30 | 3.36 |
| 9 | 2.35 | 2.14 | 2.52 | 3.04 | 2.38 | 2.94 | 2.67 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.64 | 3.38 |
| 10 | 2.40 | 2.34 | 1.85 | 2.51 | 2.90 | 2.23 | 2.00 | 2.37 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 1.82 | 2.57 |
| 11 | 2.32 | 2.32 | 1.90 | 2.12 | 2.77 | 2.03 | 2.10 | 2.30 | 2.64 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 2.32 |
| 12 | 3.23 | 3.02 | 2.58 | 2.64 | 3.47 | 2.37 | 2.68 | 3.36 | 3.38 | 2.57 | 2.32 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.67 |
| 2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
| 3 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.71 |
| 4 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.67 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.70 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.68 |
| 8 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.65 |
| 9 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.67 |
| 10 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 11 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| 12 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013