| Project Name | Ad |
| Project Name | Ad |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 220.0 | 186.1 | 166.7 | 158.0 | 156.6 | 139.1 | 113.6 | 87.4 | 66.5 | 50.0 | 42.6 | 38.6 |
| Cluster size | 303 | 272 | 243 | 211 | 245 | 181 | 152 | 136 | 97 | 52 | 56 | 52 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.75 | 4.70 | 4.54 | 4.42 | 4.34 | 4.78 | 4.41 | 4.24 | 4.29 | 4.99 | 4.66 | 4.51 |
| GDT_TS | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.61 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.73 | 1.88 | 1.93 | 2.06 | 2.23 | 2.33 | 2.15 | 2.50 | 1.73 | 2.74 | 2.95 |
| 2 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.11 | 2.32 | 2.24 | 2.45 | 2.49 | 2.53 | 1.67 | 2.95 | 3.28 |
| 3 | 1.88 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 2.07 | 2.35 | 2.75 | 2.28 | 2.45 | 2.15 | 2.56 | 3.12 |
| 4 | 1.93 | 2.11 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 2.64 | 2.48 | 2.34 | 2.32 | 2.15 | 2.55 | 2.73 |
| 5 | 2.06 | 2.32 | 2.07 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.55 | 1.77 | 2.43 | 2.46 | 2.78 | 3.06 |
| 6 | 2.23 | 2.24 | 2.35 | 2.64 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 2.74 | 2.31 | 2.69 | 2.53 | 3.09 | 3.33 |
| 7 | 2.33 | 2.45 | 2.75 | 2.48 | 2.55 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 2.86 | 2.44 | 2.84 | 2.82 |
| 8 | 2.15 | 2.49 | 2.28 | 2.34 | 1.77 | 2.31 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 2.74 | 2.85 | 3.02 |
| 9 | 2.50 | 2.53 | 2.45 | 2.32 | 2.43 | 2.69 | 2.86 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 3.05 | 2.63 |
| 10 | 1.73 | 1.67 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.46 | 2.53 | 2.44 | 2.74 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 2.92 | 3.28 |
| 11 | 2.74 | 2.95 | 2.56 | 2.55 | 2.78 | 3.09 | 2.84 | 2.85 | 3.05 | 2.92 | 0.00 | 3.28 |
| 12 | 2.95 | 3.28 | 3.12 | 2.73 | 3.06 | 3.33 | 2.82 | 3.02 | 2.63 | 3.28 | 3.28 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.67 |
| 3 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| 4 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| 6 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.69 |
| 7 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| 8 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| 9 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.77 |
| 10 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.67 |
| 11 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.68 |
| 12 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013