Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 234.5 | 188.9 | 186.8 | 185.1 | 169.4 | 167.1 | 158.7 | 136.2 | 133.3 | 114.3 | 78.1 | 40.0 |
Cluster size | 260 | 207 | 211 | 206 | 184 | 182 | 177 | 161 | 147 | 123 | 101 | 41 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.0 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 3.46 | 3.44 | 3.96 | 3.30 | 3.36 | 3.75 | 3.50 | 3.23 | 3.53 | 3.55 | 2.48 | 2.51 |
GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 2.78 | 1.99 | 1.95 | 2.01 | 1.94 | 2.33 | 1.93 | 2.03 | 3.02 | 3.68 |
2 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 2.84 | 1.93 | 2.09 | 2.05 | 1.99 | 2.54 | 2.18 | 1.90 | 3.16 | 3.59 |
3 | 2.78 | 2.84 | 0.00 | 3.09 | 2.86 | 2.99 | 2.97 | 2.93 | 2.85 | 2.75 | 3.59 | 4.24 |
4 | 1.99 | 1.93 | 3.09 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 2.28 | 2.02 | 2.33 | 2.19 | 2.16 | 3.02 | 3.48 |
5 | 1.95 | 2.09 | 2.86 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 2.09 | 1.96 | 1.97 | 1.81 | 2.13 | 2.91 | 3.48 |
6 | 2.01 | 2.05 | 2.99 | 2.28 | 2.09 | 0.00 | 1.84 | 2.47 | 1.96 | 1.86 | 3.55 | 3.96 |
7 | 1.94 | 1.99 | 2.97 | 2.02 | 1.96 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 1.81 | 1.94 | 3.29 | 3.72 |
8 | 2.33 | 2.54 | 2.93 | 2.33 | 1.97 | 2.47 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 2.23 | 2.78 | 3.62 |
9 | 1.93 | 2.18 | 2.85 | 2.19 | 1.81 | 1.96 | 1.81 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 3.24 | 3.74 |
10 | 2.03 | 1.90 | 2.75 | 2.16 | 2.13 | 1.86 | 1.94 | 2.23 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 3.39 | 3.82 |
11 | 3.02 | 3.16 | 3.59 | 3.02 | 2.91 | 3.55 | 3.29 | 2.78 | 3.24 | 3.39 | 0.00 | 2.42 |
12 | 3.68 | 3.59 | 4.24 | 3.48 | 3.48 | 3.96 | 3.72 | 3.62 | 3.74 | 3.82 | 2.42 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
2 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.67 |
3 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.68 |
4 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
5 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.71 |
6 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
7 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
8 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.66 |
9 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.68 |
10 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
11 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
12 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013