Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 182.2 | 163.1 | 155.4 | 135.7 | 122.9 | 103.3 | 95.3 | 91.8 | 89.9 | 88.2 | 84.8 | 81.5 |
Cluster size | 255 | 224 | 227 | 187 | 180 | 145 | 139 | 129 | 147 | 132 | 111 | 124 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.99 | 2.90 | 2.92 | 3.37 | 3.22 | 2.88 | 3.03 | 3.01 | 3.06 | 2.90 | 3.46 | 3.24 |
GDT_TS | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.60 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.09 | 2.64 | 2.97 | 2.94 | 2.52 | 2.51 | 2.24 | 3.27 | 2.44 | 2.55 | 2.58 |
2 | 2.09 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 2.36 | 2.60 | 2.34 | 2.32 | 1.92 | 2.92 | 2.36 | 2.38 | 2.87 |
3 | 2.64 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 2.62 | 2.60 | 2.63 | 2.03 | 2.86 | 2.89 | 2.52 | 2.85 |
4 | 2.97 | 2.36 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 2.69 | 2.46 | 2.60 | 2.59 | 2.95 | 3.13 | 2.66 | 3.40 |
5 | 2.94 | 2.60 | 2.62 | 2.69 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 2.71 | 2.76 | 2.56 | 3.13 | 3.04 | 3.18 |
6 | 2.52 | 2.34 | 2.60 | 2.46 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.75 | 3.02 | 2.69 | 2.38 | 2.97 |
7 | 2.51 | 2.32 | 2.63 | 2.60 | 2.71 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 3.02 | 2.78 | 2.25 | 3.12 |
8 | 2.24 | 1.92 | 2.03 | 2.59 | 2.76 | 2.75 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 2.82 | 2.46 | 2.67 | 2.69 |
9 | 3.27 | 2.92 | 2.86 | 2.95 | 2.56 | 3.02 | 3.02 | 2.82 | 0.00 | 3.12 | 3.27 | 3.42 |
10 | 2.44 | 2.36 | 2.89 | 3.13 | 3.13 | 2.69 | 2.78 | 2.46 | 3.12 | 0.00 | 2.93 | 2.69 |
11 | 2.55 | 2.38 | 2.52 | 2.66 | 3.04 | 2.38 | 2.25 | 2.67 | 3.27 | 2.93 | 0.00 | 3.17 |
12 | 2.58 | 2.87 | 2.85 | 3.40 | 3.18 | 2.97 | 3.12 | 2.69 | 3.42 | 2.69 | 3.17 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.66 |
2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.64 |
3 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.61 |
4 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.61 |
5 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.58 |
6 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.61 |
7 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.61 |
8 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.66 |
9 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.57 |
10 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.67 |
11 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.65 |
12 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013