Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 267.3 | 152.9 | 141.4 | 135.0 | 134.2 | 112.9 | 101.0 | 95.0 | 68.4 | 66.4 | 55.7 | 55.4 |
Cluster size | 399 | 212 | 209 | 199 | 192 | 169 | 138 | 144 | 94 | 85 | 72 | 87 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.64 | 3.00 | 2.63 | 2.77 | 2.80 | 2.50 | 2.99 | 3.01 | 2.70 | 2.99 | 3.08 | 2.97 |
GDT_TS | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.65 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 1.96 | 2.07 | 2.25 | 1.64 | 2.45 | 2.25 | 1.92 | 2.13 | 2.39 | 2.34 |
2 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 1.72 | 2.14 | 2.31 | 2.19 | 2.21 | 2.29 | 1.99 | 2.20 | 2.16 |
3 | 1.96 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.35 | 2.07 | 2.52 | 2.56 | 2.15 | 2.32 | 2.43 | 2.49 |
4 | 2.07 | 1.72 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 2.29 | 2.20 | 1.94 | 2.03 | 1.85 | 2.00 | 1.99 |
5 | 2.25 | 2.14 | 2.35 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 2.40 | 1.99 | 2.35 | 1.87 | 2.22 | 2.23 |
6 | 1.64 | 2.31 | 2.07 | 2.29 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 2.28 | 2.13 | 2.16 | 2.32 | 2.53 |
7 | 2.45 | 2.19 | 2.52 | 2.20 | 2.40 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 2.04 | 2.73 | 2.54 | 2.47 | 1.96 |
8 | 2.25 | 2.21 | 2.56 | 1.94 | 1.99 | 2.28 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 2.25 | 2.20 | 2.09 |
9 | 1.92 | 2.29 | 2.15 | 2.03 | 2.35 | 2.13 | 2.73 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 2.45 | 2.38 |
10 | 2.13 | 1.99 | 2.32 | 1.85 | 1.87 | 2.16 | 2.54 | 2.25 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 2.06 | 2.37 |
11 | 2.39 | 2.20 | 2.43 | 2.00 | 2.22 | 2.32 | 2.47 | 2.20 | 2.45 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 2.33 |
12 | 2.34 | 2.16 | 2.49 | 1.99 | 2.23 | 2.53 | 1.96 | 2.09 | 2.38 | 2.37 | 2.33 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.72 |
2 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
3 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
4 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.74 |
5 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.75 |
6 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
7 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.75 |
8 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.76 |
9 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.72 |
10 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
11 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.72 |
12 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013