| Project Name | Ma |
| Project Name | Ma |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 213.4 | 210.7 | 179.9 | 174.9 | 151.7 | 142.8 | 140.2 | 136.1 | 124.8 | 117.3 | 108.2 | 105.8 |
| Cluster size | 234 | 238 | 205 | 185 | 163 | 169 | 169 | 161 | 142 | 121 | 107 | 106 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.32 | 2.08 | 2.10 | 2.35 | 2.19 | 1.96 | 2.20 | 2.22 | 2.30 | 2.17 | 2.14 | 2.30 |
| GDT_TS | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 2.02 | 2.15 | 2.33 | 2.04 | 1.74 | 1.54 | 2.27 | 1.95 | 1.90 | 1.95 |
| 2 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 1.66 | 2.24 | 2.22 | 1.69 | 1.79 | 1.88 | 2.36 | 2.02 | 2.01 | 2.12 |
| 3 | 2.02 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 2.35 | 2.40 | 1.17 | 1.89 | 1.84 | 2.42 | 2.19 | 2.00 | 2.19 |
| 4 | 2.15 | 2.24 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 1.48 | 2.25 | 2.02 | 2.19 | 1.47 | 1.67 | 1.70 | 1.59 |
| 5 | 2.33 | 2.22 | 2.40 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 2.04 | 2.42 | 1.55 | 1.80 | 1.84 | 1.98 |
| 6 | 2.04 | 1.69 | 1.17 | 2.25 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 1.88 | 1.75 | 2.29 | 2.09 | 1.90 | 2.07 |
| 7 | 1.74 | 1.79 | 1.89 | 2.02 | 2.04 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 1.71 | 2.07 | 1.85 | 1.71 | 1.92 |
| 8 | 1.54 | 1.88 | 1.84 | 2.19 | 2.42 | 1.75 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 1.99 | 1.87 | 1.89 |
| 9 | 2.27 | 2.36 | 2.42 | 1.47 | 1.55 | 2.29 | 2.07 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 1.74 | 1.84 | 1.82 |
| 10 | 1.95 | 2.02 | 2.19 | 1.67 | 1.80 | 2.09 | 1.85 | 1.99 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 1.64 | 1.79 |
| 11 | 1.90 | 2.01 | 2.00 | 1.70 | 1.84 | 1.90 | 1.71 | 1.87 | 1.84 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.66 |
| 12 | 1.95 | 2.12 | 2.19 | 1.59 | 1.98 | 2.07 | 1.92 | 1.89 | 1.82 | 1.79 | 1.66 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.92 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 4 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| 6 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.76 |
| 7 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| 8 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| 9 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 |
| 10 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.79 |
| 11 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| 12 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013