| Project Name | Mutation129DtoE |
| Project Name | Mutation129DtoE |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 153.2 | 137.4 | 127.5 | 120.5 | 119.5 | 116.0 | 91.2 | 72.0 | 68.7 | 66.0 | 45.9 | 41.6 |
| Cluster size | 322 | 251 | 174 | 195 | 180 | 198 | 140 | 151 | 109 | 137 | 89 | 54 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.04 | 3.53 | 3.18 | 4.30 | 5.47 | 4.40 | 4.78 | 4.91 | 3.69 | 4.79 | 4.87 | 5.75 |
| GDT_TS | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.57 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.64 | 1.92 | 3.98 | 4.66 | 4.11 | 3.56 | 2.10 | 2.60 | 2.23 | 2.14 | 3.43 |
| 2 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 3.79 | 4.58 | 3.93 | 3.39 | 2.77 | 2.07 | 2.82 | 2.53 | 3.95 |
| 3 | 1.92 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 3.81 | 5.55 | 3.84 | 4.00 | 2.96 | 2.44 | 3.10 | 2.97 | 4.20 |
| 4 | 3.98 | 3.79 | 3.81 | 0.00 | 5.31 | 4.54 | 5.01 | 4.28 | 3.22 | 4.81 | 4.55 | 4.80 |
| 5 | 4.66 | 4.58 | 5.55 | 5.31 | 0.00 | 3.79 | 3.74 | 4.72 | 4.66 | 4.98 | 3.92 | 5.12 |
| 6 | 4.11 | 3.93 | 3.84 | 4.54 | 3.79 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 4.30 | 3.28 | 3.68 | 4.20 | 3.75 |
| 7 | 3.56 | 3.39 | 4.00 | 5.01 | 3.74 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 3.82 | 3.36 | 2.78 | 3.57 | 3.04 |
| 8 | 2.10 | 2.77 | 2.96 | 4.28 | 4.72 | 4.30 | 3.82 | 0.00 | 3.51 | 2.77 | 2.08 | 3.29 |
| 9 | 2.60 | 2.07 | 2.44 | 3.22 | 4.66 | 3.28 | 3.36 | 3.51 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 3.16 | 3.94 |
| 10 | 2.23 | 2.82 | 3.10 | 4.81 | 4.98 | 3.68 | 2.78 | 2.77 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.40 |
| 11 | 2.14 | 2.53 | 2.97 | 4.55 | 3.92 | 4.20 | 3.57 | 2.08 | 3.16 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 3.65 |
| 12 | 3.43 | 3.95 | 4.20 | 4.80 | 5.12 | 3.75 | 3.04 | 3.29 | 3.94 | 2.40 | 3.65 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.80 |
| 2 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.80 |
| 3 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
| 4 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 |
| 7 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.79 |
| 8 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.75 |
| 9 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| 10 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.82 |
| 11 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.84 |
| 12 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013