| Project Name | 8d |
| Project Name | 8d |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 152.4 | 142.4 | 127.3 | 120.1 | 115.3 | 105.0 | 94.4 | 91.4 | 86.0 | 51.0 | 49.9 | 39.1 |
| Cluster size | 264 | 231 | 231 | 202 | 188 | 172 | 171 | 151 | 147 | 79 | 92 | 72 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.19 | 4.80 | 5.16 | 5.03 | 4.79 | 5.43 | 5.26 | 5.78 | 5.26 | 4.88 | 4.72 | 4.72 |
| GDT_TS | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.53 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 2.73 | 2.68 | 3.52 | 3.17 | 2.65 | 3.40 | 2.29 | 3.48 | 3.83 | 3.92 |
| 2 | 2.58 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 2.90 | 3.38 | 3.03 | 3.21 | 3.83 | 2.82 | 3.51 | 3.87 | 3.83 |
| 3 | 2.73 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 3.59 | 2.90 | 3.04 | 3.47 | 2.99 | 3.35 | 3.67 | 3.65 |
| 4 | 2.68 | 2.90 | 2.67 | 0.00 | 3.42 | 3.03 | 2.99 | 3.61 | 2.71 | 3.45 | 3.81 | 3.91 |
| 5 | 3.52 | 3.38 | 3.59 | 3.42 | 0.00 | 3.57 | 3.65 | 3.28 | 3.49 | 2.52 | 4.01 | 4.01 |
| 6 | 3.17 | 3.03 | 2.90 | 3.03 | 3.57 | 0.00 | 3.49 | 3.79 | 2.81 | 3.52 | 4.27 | 4.41 |
| 7 | 2.65 | 3.21 | 3.04 | 2.99 | 3.65 | 3.49 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 2.70 | 3.22 | 3.55 | 4.03 |
| 8 | 3.40 | 3.83 | 3.47 | 3.61 | 3.28 | 3.79 | 3.27 | 0.00 | 3.63 | 3.23 | 4.49 | 4.46 |
| 9 | 2.29 | 2.82 | 2.99 | 2.71 | 3.49 | 2.81 | 2.70 | 3.63 | 0.00 | 3.47 | 3.82 | 4.23 |
| 10 | 3.48 | 3.51 | 3.35 | 3.45 | 2.52 | 3.52 | 3.22 | 3.23 | 3.47 | 0.00 | 3.54 | 3.70 |
| 11 | 3.83 | 3.87 | 3.67 | 3.81 | 4.01 | 4.27 | 3.55 | 4.49 | 3.82 | 3.54 | 0.00 | 3.01 |
| 12 | 3.92 | 3.83 | 3.65 | 3.91 | 4.01 | 4.41 | 4.03 | 4.46 | 4.23 | 3.70 | 3.01 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.57 |
| 2 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.57 |
| 3 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.60 |
| 4 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.57 |
| 5 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.60 |
| 6 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.57 |
| 7 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.60 |
| 8 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.56 |
| 9 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.55 |
| 10 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| 11 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.63 |
| 12 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013