| Project Name | CNOT1_relax |
| Project Name | CNOT1_relax |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 154.7 | 148.2 | 140.7 | 133.4 | 116.6 | 115.9 | 111.8 | 105.8 | 91.3 | 80.4 | 71.8 | 66.5 |
| Cluster size | 225 | 210 | 212 | 208 | 173 | 194 | 177 | 160 | 142 | 99 | 103 | 97 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.82 | 3.03 | 3.21 | 2.42 | 3.01 | 2.70 | 3.26 | 3.18 | 2.73 | 2.98 | 2.87 | 2.95 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.76 | 2.69 | 2.52 | 2.16 | 2.51 | 3.03 | 2.50 | 2.66 | 2.03 | 2.89 | 2.29 |
| 2 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 2.25 | 2.71 | 2.40 | 2.46 | 2.67 | 2.04 | 2.89 | 2.42 | 2.73 | 2.42 |
| 3 | 2.69 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 2.18 | 2.39 | 2.03 | 1.75 | 2.65 | 2.64 | 2.34 | 2.26 |
| 4 | 2.52 | 2.71 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 1.88 | 2.37 | 2.55 | 1.98 | 2.49 | 1.84 | 2.51 |
| 5 | 2.16 | 2.40 | 2.18 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 2.21 | 2.36 | 2.49 | 2.38 | 2.53 | 2.04 |
| 6 | 2.51 | 2.46 | 2.39 | 1.88 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.27 | 2.24 | 2.65 | 2.12 | 2.22 |
| 7 | 3.03 | 2.67 | 2.03 | 2.37 | 2.21 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 2.37 | 2.90 | 2.06 | 2.75 |
| 8 | 2.50 | 2.04 | 1.75 | 2.55 | 2.36 | 2.27 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 2.42 | 2.30 | 2.36 |
| 9 | 2.66 | 2.89 | 2.65 | 1.98 | 2.49 | 2.24 | 2.37 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 2.20 | 2.88 |
| 10 | 2.03 | 2.42 | 2.64 | 2.49 | 2.38 | 2.65 | 2.90 | 2.42 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 2.17 |
| 11 | 2.89 | 2.73 | 2.34 | 1.84 | 2.53 | 2.12 | 2.06 | 2.30 | 2.20 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 2.52 |
| 12 | 2.29 | 2.42 | 2.26 | 2.51 | 2.04 | 2.22 | 2.75 | 2.36 | 2.88 | 2.17 | 2.52 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 |
| 2 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| 3 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.75 |
| 4 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.72 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.80 |
| 6 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.77 |
| 7 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.79 |
| 8 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.76 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.67 |
| 10 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.77 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 12 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013