| Project Name | Geo71_12ERFM5 |
| Project Name | Geo71_12ERFM5 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 207.6 | 172.8 | 159.1 | 148.3 | 143.9 | 141.7 | 123.3 | 116.3 | 114.2 | 113.2 | 79.0 | 58.7 |
| Cluster size | 259 | 207 | 200 | 193 | 181 | 169 | 172 | 150 | 162 | 137 | 93 | 77 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.22 | 3.11 | 3.31 | 3.27 | 2.74 | 3.33 | 3.24 | 2.97 | 3.33 | 4.28 | 3.04 | 2.63 |
| GDT_TS | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 2.16 | 2.90 | 2.31 | 2.34 | 2.33 | 2.61 | 2.59 | 3.21 | 3.06 | 2.76 |
| 2 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.90 | 2.24 | 1.98 | 2.23 | 2.55 | 2.65 | 3.04 | 3.18 | 2.88 |
| 3 | 2.16 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 2.59 | 2.45 | 2.50 | 2.65 | 2.22 | 2.55 | 3.60 | 3.04 | 2.58 |
| 4 | 2.90 | 2.90 | 2.59 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 3.05 | 3.28 | 2.54 | 2.84 | 4.33 | 2.35 | 2.38 |
| 5 | 2.31 | 2.24 | 2.45 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.29 | 2.49 | 2.82 | 3.39 | 2.56 | 2.51 |
| 6 | 2.34 | 1.98 | 2.50 | 3.05 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 2.81 | 2.78 | 2.89 | 3.38 | 3.03 |
| 7 | 2.33 | 2.23 | 2.65 | 3.28 | 2.29 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 2.92 | 2.94 | 2.64 | 3.33 | 3.17 |
| 8 | 2.61 | 2.55 | 2.22 | 2.54 | 2.49 | 2.81 | 2.92 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 3.97 | 2.97 | 2.06 |
| 9 | 2.59 | 2.65 | 2.55 | 2.84 | 2.82 | 2.78 | 2.94 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 3.33 | 2.49 |
| 10 | 3.21 | 3.04 | 3.60 | 4.33 | 3.39 | 2.89 | 2.64 | 3.97 | 3.61 | 0.00 | 4.55 | 4.11 |
| 11 | 3.06 | 3.18 | 3.04 | 2.35 | 2.56 | 3.38 | 3.33 | 2.97 | 3.33 | 4.55 | 0.00 | 2.53 |
| 12 | 2.76 | 2.88 | 2.58 | 2.38 | 2.51 | 3.03 | 3.17 | 2.06 | 2.49 | 4.11 | 2.53 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
| 2 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| 3 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| 7 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.66 |
| 8 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.76 |
| 9 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.72 |
| 10 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.63 |
| 11 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.70 |
| 12 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013