| Project Name | 11 |
| Project Name | 11 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 527.2 | 500.1 | 457.5 | 383.5 | 260.2 | 232.6 | 168.8 | 46.7 | 45.1 | 40.3 | 38.0 | 28.2 |
| Cluster size | 352 | 346 | 320 | 259 | 212 | 210 | 134 | 42 | 38 | 38 | 32 | 17 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.66 | 1.86 | 1.62 | 1.73 | 1.45 | 1.84 | 2.11 | 1.29 | 2.76 | 1.76 | 2.87 | 2.22 |
| GDT_TS | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.84 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 1.58 | 0.93 | 2.70 | 0.80 | 2.71 | 1.52 |
| 2 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.53 | 1.58 | 1.21 | 2.96 | 0.71 | 2.90 | 1.43 |
| 3 | 0.39 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 1.62 | 0.89 | 2.52 | 0.91 | 2.57 | 1.47 |
| 4 | 0.50 | 0.71 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.64 | 0.52 | 1.73 | 0.95 | 2.62 | 0.95 | 2.66 | 1.53 |
| 5 | 0.51 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 1.55 | 0.76 | 2.59 | 0.90 | 2.62 | 1.55 |
| 6 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 1.57 | 1.10 | 2.82 | 0.77 | 2.78 | 1.55 |
| 7 | 1.58 | 1.58 | 1.62 | 1.73 | 1.55 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.86 | 2.46 | 1.57 | 2.28 | 2.12 |
| 8 | 0.93 | 1.21 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.76 | 1.10 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 1.13 | 2.78 | 1.78 |
| 9 | 2.70 | 2.96 | 2.52 | 2.62 | 2.59 | 2.82 | 2.46 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 0.82 | 3.07 |
| 10 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.77 | 1.57 | 1.13 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 1.51 |
| 11 | 2.71 | 2.90 | 2.57 | 2.66 | 2.62 | 2.78 | 2.28 | 2.78 | 0.82 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 3.08 |
| 12 | 1.52 | 1.43 | 1.47 | 1.53 | 1.55 | 1.55 | 2.12 | 1.78 | 3.07 | 1.51 | 3.08 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.96 |
| 2 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.95 |
| 3 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.96 |
| 4 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.96 |
| 5 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 0.95 |
| 6 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.96 |
| 7 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.93 |
| 8 | 0.98 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.93 |
| 9 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 0.88 |
| 10 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.95 |
| 11 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.87 |
| 12 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013