| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant103 |
| Project Name | CHEM361IndividualProjectCJL_Mutant103 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 117.6 | 115.0 | 96.0 | 92.6 | 83.6 | 79.7 | 63.8 | 56.8 | 43.4 | 32.4 | 25.4 | 24.2 |
| Cluster size | 252 | 320 | 199 | 295 | 177 | 174 | 115 | 177 | 105 | 94 | 42 | 50 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.1 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 2.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 8.82 | 3.95 | 3.57 | 3.83 | 7.25 | 6.89 | 5.39 | 5.08 | 4.10 | 9.41 | 7.70 | 10.20 |
| GDT_TS | 0.38 | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.36 | 0.46 | 0.34 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 9.43 | 7.09 | 8.67 | 2.84 | 3.52 | 5.02 | 8.75 | 9.65 | 1.97 | 9.63 | 3.83 |
| 2 | 9.43 | 0.00 | 4.09 | 2.20 | 7.99 | 7.78 | 6.43 | 3.83 | 1.12 | 10.00 | 6.48 | 10.60 |
| 3 | 7.09 | 4.09 | 0.00 | 4.24 | 5.20 | 4.65 | 3.15 | 5.16 | 4.62 | 7.70 | 7.89 | 8.52 |
| 4 | 8.67 | 2.20 | 4.24 | 0.00 | 7.46 | 7.26 | 5.94 | 2.93 | 2.30 | 9.10 | 5.68 | 9.75 |
| 5 | 2.84 | 7.99 | 5.20 | 7.46 | 0.00 | 2.01 | 3.53 | 7.79 | 8.23 | 3.86 | 9.27 | 5.01 |
| 6 | 3.52 | 7.78 | 4.65 | 7.26 | 2.01 | 0.00 | 2.43 | 7.51 | 8.10 | 4.07 | 9.17 | 5.61 |
| 7 | 5.02 | 6.43 | 3.15 | 5.94 | 3.53 | 2.43 | 0.00 | 6.37 | 6.83 | 5.50 | 8.40 | 6.96 |
| 8 | 8.75 | 3.83 | 5.16 | 2.93 | 7.79 | 7.51 | 6.37 | 0.00 | 4.15 | 8.85 | 4.80 | 9.19 |
| 9 | 9.65 | 1.12 | 4.62 | 2.30 | 8.23 | 8.10 | 6.83 | 4.15 | 0.00 | 10.40 | 6.76 | 11.00 |
| 10 | 1.97 | 10.00 | 7.70 | 9.10 | 3.86 | 4.07 | 5.50 | 8.85 | 10.40 | 0.00 | 9.49 | 3.04 |
| 11 | 9.63 | 6.48 | 7.89 | 5.68 | 9.27 | 9.17 | 8.40 | 4.80 | 6.76 | 9.49 | 0.00 | 9.17 |
| 12 | 3.83 | 10.60 | 8.52 | 9.75 | 5.01 | 5.61 | 6.96 | 9.19 | 11.00 | 3.04 | 9.17 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.94 | 0.43 | 0.70 |
| 2 | 0.43 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.90 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.46 | 0.80 | 0.96 | 0.43 | 0.78 | 0.37 |
| 3 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.44 |
| 4 | 0.42 | 0.90 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.42 | 0.77 | 0.37 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.39 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.70 | 0.41 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.64 | 0.36 | 0.56 | 0.35 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.65 | 0.35 | 0.55 |
| 7 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.69 | 0.43 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.50 |
| 8 | 0.43 | 0.80 | 0.53 | 0.79 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 0.78 | 0.37 |
| 9 | 0.44 | 0.96 | 0.50 | 0.89 | 0.42 | 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 0.79 | 0.37 |
| 10 | 0.94 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 0.68 |
| 11 | 0.43 | 0.78 | 0.47 | 0.77 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 1.00 | 0.37 |
| 12 | 0.70 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.68 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.68 | 0.37 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013