| Project Name | 28ItoTLiv |
| Project Name | 28ItoTLiv |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 319.5 | 217.2 | 191.3 | 187.0 | 167.0 | 131.7 | 78.6 | 50.6 | 45.6 | 43.6 | 43.4 | 24.5 |
| Cluster size | 371 | 263 | 260 | 211 | 213 | 176 | 125 | 91 | 89 | 84 | 82 | 35 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.25 | 5.50 | 5.86 | 1.70 | 5.05 | 4.91 | 5.14 | 4.29 | 4.62 | 2.53 | 4.43 | 1.28 |
| GDT_TS | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.89 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.66 | 1.06 | 4.20 | 1.14 | 0.98 | 1.41 | 1.67 | 2.12 | 3.79 | 3.22 | 4.66 |
| 2 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 4.45 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.44 | 2.00 | 2.27 | 4.12 | 3.49 | 4.91 |
| 3 | 1.06 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 4.75 | 1.56 | 1.64 | 1.58 | 2.44 | 2.63 | 4.48 | 3.64 | 5.26 |
| 4 | 4.20 | 4.45 | 4.75 | 0.00 | 3.93 | 3.87 | 3.97 | 3.38 | 3.60 | 1.67 | 4.12 | 0.99 |
| 5 | 1.14 | 1.35 | 1.56 | 3.93 | 0.00 | 1.22 | 1.20 | 1.35 | 2.22 | 3.47 | 2.94 | 4.43 |
| 6 | 0.98 | 1.35 | 1.64 | 3.87 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 1.57 | 1.48 | 1.98 | 3.53 | 3.31 | 4.36 |
| 7 | 1.41 | 1.44 | 1.58 | 3.97 | 1.20 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.82 | 1.80 | 3.72 | 3.17 | 4.46 |
| 8 | 1.67 | 2.00 | 2.44 | 3.38 | 1.35 | 1.48 | 1.82 | 0.00 | 1.97 | 2.79 | 2.62 | 3.76 |
| 9 | 2.12 | 2.27 | 2.63 | 3.60 | 2.22 | 1.98 | 1.80 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 3.43 | 3.24 | 3.96 |
| 10 | 3.79 | 4.12 | 4.48 | 1.67 | 3.47 | 3.53 | 3.72 | 2.79 | 3.43 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 1.71 |
| 11 | 3.22 | 3.49 | 3.64 | 4.12 | 2.94 | 3.31 | 3.17 | 2.62 | 3.24 | 3.41 | 0.00 | 4.17 |
| 12 | 4.66 | 4.91 | 5.26 | 0.99 | 4.43 | 4.36 | 4.46 | 3.76 | 3.96 | 1.71 | 4.17 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.83 |
| 2 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.83 |
| 3 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.81 |
| 4 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 0.81 | 0.97 |
| 5 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.86 |
| 6 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| 7 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.83 |
| 8 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.83 |
| 9 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.83 |
| 10 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.94 |
| 11 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| 12 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.97 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.94 | 0.80 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013