| Project Name | Mutation_33N |
| Project Name | Mutation_33N |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 475.6 | 475.0 | 337.6 | 279.2 | 228.0 | 178.5 | 82.4 | 61.5 | 41.5 | 33.3 | 30.4 | 22.5 |
| Cluster size | 381 | 362 | 302 | 250 | 222 | 166 | 77 | 54 | 69 | 44 | 33 | 40 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.67 | 1.74 | 2.05 | 2.02 | 1.80 | 2.55 | 1.81 | 2.38 | 3.02 | 4.36 | 2.67 | 3.31 |
| GDT_TS | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.71 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 1.66 | 1.41 | 1.65 | 2.46 | 3.58 | 2.15 | 2.78 |
| 2 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.89 | 0.41 | 1.51 | 1.12 | 1.48 | 2.37 | 3.49 | 2.10 | 2.72 |
| 3 | 0.79 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.01 | 0.49 | 1.40 | 1.21 | 1.63 | 2.23 | 3.28 | 2.09 | 2.66 |
| 4 | 0.66 | 0.89 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 1.76 | 1.70 | 1.64 | 2.61 | 3.49 | 2.28 | 2.75 |
| 5 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 1.48 | 1.10 | 1.47 | 2.39 | 3.45 | 2.17 | 2.72 |
| 6 | 1.66 | 1.51 | 1.40 | 1.76 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 1.36 | 2.06 | 1.60 | 2.83 | 2.25 | 2.82 |
| 7 | 1.41 | 1.12 | 1.21 | 1.70 | 1.10 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.88 | 2.15 | 3.47 | 2.08 | 2.77 |
| 8 | 1.65 | 1.48 | 1.63 | 1.64 | 1.47 | 2.06 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 3.77 | 2.56 | 3.03 |
| 9 | 2.46 | 2.37 | 2.23 | 2.61 | 2.39 | 1.60 | 2.15 | 2.86 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 1.43 | 2.44 |
| 10 | 3.58 | 3.49 | 3.28 | 3.49 | 3.45 | 2.83 | 3.47 | 3.77 | 2.34 | 0.00 | 2.89 | 2.29 |
| 11 | 2.15 | 2.10 | 2.09 | 2.28 | 2.17 | 2.25 | 2.08 | 2.56 | 1.43 | 2.89 | 0.00 | 2.20 |
| 12 | 2.78 | 2.72 | 2.66 | 2.75 | 2.72 | 2.82 | 2.77 | 3.03 | 2.44 | 2.29 | 2.20 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 0.92 | 0.83 |
| 2 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.80 |
| 3 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.93 | 0.83 |
| 4 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.89 | 0.83 |
| 5 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.93 | 0.81 |
| 6 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.79 | 0.91 | 0.83 |
| 7 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 0.91 | 0.81 |
| 8 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.78 |
| 9 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.81 |
| 10 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.88 |
| 11 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.96 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.84 |
| 12 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013