| Project Name | wild_cp |
| Project Name | wild_cp |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 136.6 | 136.3 | 121.0 | 111.3 | 97.8 | 95.7 | 88.1 | 83.8 | 81.0 | 78.4 | 68.2 | 53.6 |
| Cluster size | 202 | 226 | 202 | 220 | 152 | 157 | 159 | 170 | 136 | 139 | 119 | 118 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 2.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.21 | 3.86 | 4.06 | 3.79 | 4.18 | 4.26 | 4.67 | 3.65 | 3.99 | 3.35 | 4.09 | 3.91 |
| GDT_TS | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 4.94 | 4.86 | 4.38 | 2.76 | 2.65 | 2.02 | 4.23 | 4.72 | 3.62 | 5.08 | 3.44 |
| 2 | 4.94 | 0.00 | 2.04 | 2.08 | 4.75 | 4.38 | 5.02 | 2.49 | 2.29 | 2.75 | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| 3 | 4.86 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 4.36 | 3.89 | 4.76 | 2.15 | 1.96 | 2.33 | 1.74 | 2.49 |
| 4 | 4.38 | 2.08 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 4.34 | 3.96 | 4.45 | 2.55 | 1.99 | 2.58 | 2.22 | 2.76 |
| 5 | 2.76 | 4.75 | 4.36 | 4.34 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 2.97 | 4.14 | 4.39 | 3.54 | 4.46 | 3.13 |
| 6 | 2.65 | 4.38 | 3.89 | 3.96 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 3.55 | 4.03 | 2.97 | 4.18 | 2.77 |
| 7 | 2.02 | 5.02 | 4.76 | 4.45 | 2.97 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 4.28 | 4.70 | 3.77 | 5.10 | 3.32 |
| 8 | 4.23 | 2.49 | 2.15 | 2.55 | 4.14 | 3.55 | 4.28 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 2.41 | 2.44 | 2.27 |
| 9 | 4.72 | 2.29 | 1.96 | 1.99 | 4.39 | 4.03 | 4.70 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 1.85 | 2.65 |
| 10 | 3.62 | 2.75 | 2.33 | 2.58 | 3.54 | 2.97 | 3.77 | 2.41 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 2.43 |
| 11 | 5.08 | 2.00 | 1.74 | 2.22 | 4.46 | 4.18 | 5.10 | 2.44 | 1.85 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 2.80 |
| 12 | 3.44 | 3.00 | 2.49 | 2.76 | 3.13 | 2.77 | 3.32 | 2.27 | 2.65 | 2.43 | 2.80 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.78 |
| 2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 3 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.84 |
| 4 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.72 |
| 5 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.79 |
| 7 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.76 |
| 8 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.80 |
| 9 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| 10 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.76 |
| 11 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| 12 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013