| Project Name | mdCDKA |
| Project Name | mdCDKA |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 149.2 | 135.2 | 133.3 | 130.4 | 120.9 | 118.8 | 118.5 | 109.1 | 104.6 | 90.3 | 80.9 | 63.1 |
| Cluster size | 226 | 209 | 201 | 196 | 165 | 183 | 163 | 167 | 152 | 132 | 119 | 87 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.99 | 3.88 | 3.72 | 3.74 | 3.75 | 3.16 | 3.73 | 3.93 | 4.11 | 3.71 | 3.62 | 3.12 |
| GDT_TS | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.63 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 3.22 | 2.65 | 3.03 | 3.23 | 2.86 | 2.77 | 2.42 | 2.62 | 2.95 | 3.19 |
| 2 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 2.94 | 2.73 | 2.84 | 3.02 | 3.23 | 3.35 | 2.25 | 3.07 | 3.41 | 3.41 |
| 3 | 3.22 | 2.94 | 0.00 | 2.65 | 3.11 | 2.89 | 3.76 | 3.49 | 2.66 | 3.23 | 3.23 | 3.68 |
| 4 | 2.65 | 2.73 | 2.65 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 2.55 | 3.07 | 2.95 | 2.44 | 2.79 | 3.16 | 3.38 |
| 5 | 3.03 | 2.84 | 3.11 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 3.32 | 3.11 | 2.77 | 3.15 | 3.38 | 3.51 |
| 6 | 3.23 | 3.02 | 2.89 | 2.55 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 3.14 | 3.09 | 2.80 | 2.97 | 3.01 |
| 7 | 2.86 | 3.23 | 3.76 | 3.07 | 3.32 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 2.46 | 3.22 | 2.69 | 3.34 | 3.26 |
| 8 | 2.77 | 3.35 | 3.49 | 2.95 | 3.11 | 3.14 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 3.00 | 2.34 | 2.79 | 2.96 |
| 9 | 2.42 | 2.25 | 2.66 | 2.44 | 2.77 | 3.09 | 3.22 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 2.74 | 3.15 | 3.61 |
| 10 | 2.62 | 3.07 | 3.23 | 2.79 | 3.15 | 2.80 | 2.69 | 2.34 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 2.18 | 2.64 |
| 11 | 2.95 | 3.41 | 3.23 | 3.16 | 3.38 | 2.97 | 3.34 | 2.79 | 3.15 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| 12 | 3.19 | 3.41 | 3.68 | 3.38 | 3.51 | 3.01 | 3.26 | 2.96 | 3.61 | 2.64 | 2.29 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.64 |
| 2 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.61 |
| 3 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.60 |
| 4 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.60 |
| 5 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.57 |
| 6 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| 7 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.65 |
| 8 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.64 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.58 |
| 10 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| 11 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| 12 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013