| Project Name | new_tada |
| Project Name | new_tada |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 179.8 | 160.2 | 151.4 | 141.7 | 129.2 | 122.7 | 107.0 | 106.4 | 104.0 | 102.3 | 87.0 | 76.6 |
| Cluster size | 242 | 224 | 201 | 203 | 166 | 180 | 144 | 142 | 148 | 140 | 104 | 106 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.21 | 2.70 | 2.16 | 2.40 | 2.37 | 2.00 | 2.54 | 2.27 | 2.36 | 2.51 | 2.33 | 2.46 |
| GDT_TS | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.75 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 1.82 | 1.75 | 1.86 | 2.26 | 1.89 | 1.89 | 1.87 | 1.90 | 1.91 | 1.84 |
| 2 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.64 | 1.71 | 2.13 | 3.06 | 2.27 | 2.54 | 2.21 | 2.54 | 2.52 | 2.20 |
| 3 | 1.82 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 1.89 | 2.06 | 2.23 | 1.84 | 2.14 | 2.11 | 2.05 | 1.80 |
| 4 | 1.75 | 1.71 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 1.88 | 2.68 | 2.13 | 2.20 | 1.99 | 2.14 | 2.20 | 1.96 |
| 5 | 1.86 | 2.13 | 1.89 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 1.83 | 1.80 | 1.65 | 2.08 | 1.90 | 1.59 |
| 6 | 2.26 | 3.06 | 2.06 | 2.68 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 2.12 | 2.57 | 2.16 | 2.24 | 2.47 |
| 7 | 1.89 | 2.27 | 2.23 | 2.13 | 1.83 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 1.95 | 1.65 | 2.02 | 1.95 | 1.57 |
| 8 | 1.89 | 2.54 | 1.84 | 2.20 | 1.80 | 2.12 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 1.86 | 1.65 | 1.73 |
| 9 | 1.87 | 2.21 | 2.14 | 1.99 | 1.65 | 2.57 | 1.65 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 1.86 | 1.85 |
| 10 | 1.90 | 2.54 | 2.11 | 2.14 | 2.08 | 2.16 | 2.02 | 1.86 | 1.93 | 0.00 | 2.06 | 1.83 |
| 11 | 1.91 | 2.52 | 2.05 | 2.20 | 1.90 | 2.24 | 1.95 | 1.65 | 1.86 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 2.02 |
| 12 | 1.84 | 2.20 | 1.80 | 1.96 | 1.59 | 2.47 | 1.57 | 1.73 | 1.85 | 1.83 | 2.02 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| 2 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.82 |
| 3 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.81 |
| 4 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.81 |
| 5 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.82 |
| 6 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| 7 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.82 |
| 8 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.81 |
| 9 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.79 |
| 10 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.78 |
| 11 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.78 |
| 12 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013