| Project Name | 129DNmut |
| Project Name | 129DNmut |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 198.2 | 192.8 | 191.0 | 180.7 | 128.3 | 120.0 | 117.2 | 112.6 | 111.3 | 93.0 | 72.5 | 53.5 |
| Cluster size | 290 | 256 | 249 | 216 | 152 | 143 | 190 | 128 | 133 | 118 | 65 | 60 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.22 | 5.29 | 5.81 | 3.91 | 6.61 | 3.65 | 5.25 | 4.62 | 4.28 | 5.07 | 4.22 | 3.12 |
| GDT_TS | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.66 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.69 | 1.48 | 3.92 | 1.11 | 4.32 | 1.90 | 3.03 | 3.29 | 2.41 | 4.08 | 5.43 |
| 2 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.18 | 2.93 | 1.95 | 3.37 | 0.69 | 2.31 | 2.34 | 1.48 | 3.16 | 4.24 |
| 3 | 1.48 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 3.43 | 1.90 | 4.16 | 1.53 | 2.83 | 3.17 | 2.24 | 3.66 | 4.85 |
| 4 | 3.92 | 2.93 | 3.43 | 0.00 | 4.27 | 1.86 | 2.74 | 1.64 | 2.24 | 3.13 | 1.51 | 2.97 |
| 5 | 1.11 | 1.95 | 1.90 | 4.27 | 0.00 | 4.65 | 2.22 | 3.28 | 3.63 | 2.76 | 4.35 | 5.78 |
| 6 | 4.32 | 3.37 | 4.16 | 1.86 | 4.65 | 0.00 | 3.06 | 2.48 | 1.77 | 3.04 | 2.22 | 2.57 |
| 7 | 1.90 | 0.69 | 1.53 | 2.74 | 2.22 | 3.06 | 0.00 | 2.20 | 1.98 | 1.30 | 3.00 | 4.07 |
| 8 | 3.03 | 2.31 | 2.83 | 1.64 | 3.28 | 2.48 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.89 | 1.78 | 3.96 |
| 9 | 3.29 | 2.34 | 3.17 | 2.24 | 3.63 | 1.77 | 1.98 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 2.71 | 3.09 |
| 10 | 2.41 | 1.48 | 2.24 | 3.13 | 2.76 | 3.04 | 1.30 | 2.89 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 3.45 | 3.75 |
| 11 | 4.08 | 3.16 | 3.66 | 1.51 | 4.35 | 2.22 | 3.00 | 1.78 | 2.71 | 3.45 | 0.00 | 3.42 |
| 12 | 5.43 | 4.24 | 4.85 | 2.97 | 5.78 | 2.57 | 4.07 | 3.96 | 3.09 | 3.75 | 3.42 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.69 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 0.84 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| 2 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.75 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.97 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.78 |
| 3 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| 4 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.91 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.69 |
| 6 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| 7 | 0.84 | 0.97 | 0.88 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| 8 | 0.65 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.69 |
| 9 | 0.76 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.75 |
| 10 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.72 |
| 11 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.91 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| 12 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013