| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 310.6 | 177.7 | 127.9 | 115.4 | 114.4 | 89.5 | 70.1 | 54.8 | 37.1 | 36.8 | 21.6 | 13.7 |
| Cluster size | 562 | 281 | 214 | 218 | 167 | 170 | 111 | 102 | 57 | 62 | 34 | 22 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 10.40 | 11.20 | 10.80 | 10.80 | 10.90 | 10.40 | 10.90 | 7.89 | 9.30 | 9.23 | 7.57 | 8.36 |
| GDT_TS | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.56 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 3.38 | 3.11 | 2.87 | 3.32 | 3.57 | 5.08 | 4.93 | 5.39 | 5.59 | 6.55 |
| 2 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 2.70 | 3.39 | 2.36 | 2.95 | 2.94 | 5.26 | 4.74 | 5.40 | 5.80 | 6.72 |
| 3 | 3.38 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 2.72 | 3.19 | 3.18 | 5.31 | 4.58 | 5.22 | 5.45 | 6.42 |
| 4 | 3.11 | 3.39 | 3.27 | 0.00 | 2.81 | 3.15 | 3.41 | 5.16 | 4.73 | 5.47 | 5.59 | 6.19 |
| 5 | 2.87 | 2.36 | 2.72 | 2.81 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 2.86 | 5.02 | 4.53 | 5.19 | 5.54 | 6.20 |
| 6 | 3.32 | 2.95 | 3.19 | 3.15 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 4.18 | 4.16 | 4.66 | 4.79 | 5.80 |
| 7 | 3.57 | 2.94 | 3.18 | 3.41 | 2.86 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 4.54 | 4.13 | 4.91 | 5.03 | 6.02 |
| 8 | 5.08 | 5.26 | 5.31 | 5.16 | 5.02 | 4.18 | 4.54 | 0.00 | 3.97 | 4.26 | 3.14 | 4.53 |
| 9 | 4.93 | 4.74 | 4.58 | 4.73 | 4.53 | 4.16 | 4.13 | 3.97 | 0.00 | 5.33 | 4.16 | 4.91 |
| 10 | 5.39 | 5.40 | 5.22 | 5.47 | 5.19 | 4.66 | 4.91 | 4.26 | 5.33 | 0.00 | 4.34 | 4.81 |
| 11 | 5.59 | 5.80 | 5.45 | 5.59 | 5.54 | 4.79 | 5.03 | 3.14 | 4.16 | 4.34 | 0.00 | 4.21 |
| 12 | 6.55 | 6.72 | 6.42 | 6.19 | 6.20 | 5.80 | 6.02 | 4.53 | 4.91 | 4.81 | 4.21 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.52 |
| 2 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.56 |
| 3 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.52 |
| 4 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.56 |
| 5 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.55 |
| 6 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.60 |
| 7 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.59 |
| 8 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.64 |
| 9 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.60 |
| 10 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.64 |
| 11 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| 12 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013