Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 253.3 | 180.3 | 152.4 | 133.8 | 131.1 | 130.9 | 93.1 | 77.1 | 69.4 | 62.8 | 30.5 | 29.4 |
Cluster size | 351 | 277 | 193 | 182 | 188 | 160 | 150 | 132 | 131 | 132 | 54 | 50 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.7 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 8.33 | 7.08 | 6.60 | 4.53 | 7.28 | 6.81 | 6.04 | 7.63 | 3.75 | 3.98 | 4.85 | 6.98 |
GDT_TS | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.50 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 2.51 | 4.82 | 1.80 | 2.31 | 3.02 | 1.56 | 8.14 | 6.57 | 5.00 | 2.80 |
2 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 4.75 | 3.26 | 2.27 | 3.05 | 2.97 | 7.63 | 6.37 | 4.84 | 2.22 |
3 | 2.51 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 3.65 | 2.37 | 2.54 | 2.33 | 2.55 | 6.82 | 5.24 | 3.79 | 1.87 |
4 | 4.82 | 4.75 | 3.65 | 0.00 | 3.57 | 3.74 | 2.54 | 4.20 | 3.91 | 2.09 | 2.00 | 4.28 |
5 | 1.80 | 3.26 | 2.37 | 3.57 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 2.42 | 1.28 | 6.87 | 5.25 | 4.05 | 3.09 |
6 | 2.31 | 2.27 | 2.54 | 3.74 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 2.14 | 6.83 | 5.53 | 4.26 | 2.82 |
7 | 3.02 | 3.05 | 2.33 | 2.54 | 2.42 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 2.72 | 5.85 | 4.32 | 2.93 | 2.79 |
8 | 1.56 | 2.97 | 2.55 | 4.20 | 1.28 | 2.14 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 7.43 | 5.88 | 4.46 | 2.99 |
9 | 8.14 | 7.63 | 6.82 | 3.91 | 6.87 | 6.83 | 5.85 | 7.43 | 0.00 | 2.59 | 4.59 | 7.32 |
10 | 6.57 | 6.37 | 5.24 | 2.09 | 5.25 | 5.53 | 4.32 | 5.88 | 2.59 | 0.00 | 2.88 | 5.90 |
11 | 5.00 | 4.84 | 3.79 | 2.00 | 4.05 | 4.26 | 2.93 | 4.46 | 4.59 | 2.88 | 0.00 | 3.92 |
12 | 2.80 | 2.22 | 1.87 | 4.28 | 3.09 | 2.82 | 2.79 | 2.99 | 7.32 | 5.90 | 3.92 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.86 | 0.49 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.76 |
2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.61 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.83 |
3 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.90 |
4 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.67 |
5 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.82 |
6 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.80 |
7 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.77 |
8 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.64 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.81 |
9 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.49 |
10 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.81 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 0.59 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.58 |
11 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.91 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.66 |
12 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.66 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013