| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 188.9 | 169.7 | 161.5 | 141.9 | 136.1 | 131.4 | 115.6 | 108.5 | 86.9 | 76.5 | 53.8 | 19.6 |
| Cluster size | 285 | 246 | 223 | 220 | 198 | 175 | 157 | 157 | 132 | 98 | 83 | 26 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 3.08 | 2.94 | 2.65 | 3.00 | 2.60 | 2.85 | 2.75 | 2.82 | 2.50 | 2.73 | 2.38 | 2.63 |
| GDT_TS | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 2.02 | 1.94 | 2.32 | 2.13 | 1.97 | 2.43 | 2.64 | 2.09 | 2.31 | 2.96 |
| 2 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 1.89 | 2.27 | 1.85 | 2.09 | 2.67 | 2.70 | 2.07 | 2.06 | 3.32 |
| 3 | 2.02 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 2.31 | 2.07 | 2.01 | 2.63 | 2.44 | 1.98 | 2.12 | 2.89 |
| 4 | 1.94 | 1.89 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 1.99 | 2.12 | 2.21 | 2.51 | 2.05 | 2.20 | 3.27 |
| 5 | 2.32 | 2.27 | 2.31 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.41 | 2.06 | 2.10 | 2.26 | 2.00 | 3.09 |
| 6 | 2.13 | 1.85 | 2.07 | 1.99 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 2.39 | 2.69 | 2.16 | 1.91 | 3.00 |
| 7 | 1.97 | 2.09 | 2.01 | 2.12 | 2.41 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 2.80 | 2.43 | 2.04 | 2.17 | 2.95 |
| 8 | 2.43 | 2.67 | 2.63 | 2.21 | 2.06 | 2.39 | 2.80 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 2.47 | 2.33 | 3.17 |
| 9 | 2.64 | 2.70 | 2.44 | 2.51 | 2.10 | 2.69 | 2.43 | 2.55 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 2.33 | 2.82 |
| 10 | 2.09 | 2.07 | 1.98 | 2.05 | 2.26 | 2.16 | 2.04 | 2.47 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 2.17 | 2.90 |
| 11 | 2.31 | 2.06 | 2.12 | 2.20 | 2.00 | 1.91 | 2.17 | 2.33 | 2.33 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 2.56 |
| 12 | 2.96 | 3.32 | 2.89 | 3.27 | 3.09 | 3.00 | 2.95 | 3.17 | 2.82 | 2.90 | 2.56 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.74 |
| 2 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.70 |
| 3 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| 4 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.74 |
| 7 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| 8 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| 9 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.73 |
| 10 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.76 |
| 11 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.77 |
| 12 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013