| Project Name | 22LFmutation |
| Project Name | 22LFmutation |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| Cluster density | 432.4 | 424.8 | 325.7 | 314.6 | 128.2 | 98.7 | 83.6 | 74.1 | 57.9 | 46.4 | 24.5 |
| Cluster size | 406 | 371 | 302 | 249 | 169 | 103 | 97 | 102 | 112 | 52 | 37 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| RMSD | 1.95 | 1.61 | 1.70 | 1.72 | 2.55 | 1.82 | 4.37 | 6.65 | 3.57 | 2.34 | 5.88 |
| GDT_TS | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.67 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 1.40 | 1.41 | 3.74 | 6.00 | 3.23 | 1.70 | 5.31 |
| 2 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 1.65 | 1.17 | 3.74 | 5.98 | 3.05 | 1.58 | 5.17 |
| 3 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 1.56 | 1.44 | 3.65 | 5.98 | 3.13 | 1.66 | 5.27 |
| 4 | 0.74 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.51 | 1.22 | 3.62 | 5.84 | 2.94 | 1.49 | 5.03 |
| 5 | 1.40 | 1.65 | 1.56 | 1.51 | 0.00 | 1.57 | 3.98 | 6.22 | 3.53 | 2.24 | 5.43 |
| 6 | 1.41 | 1.17 | 1.44 | 1.22 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 4.04 | 6.08 | 3.08 | 1.86 | 5.27 |
| 7 | 3.74 | 3.74 | 3.65 | 3.62 | 3.98 | 4.04 | 0.00 | 3.59 | 1.62 | 3.82 | 3.34 |
| 8 | 6.00 | 5.98 | 5.98 | 5.84 | 6.22 | 6.08 | 3.59 | 0.00 | 3.83 | 5.77 | 2.31 |
| 9 | 3.23 | 3.05 | 3.13 | 2.94 | 3.53 | 3.08 | 1.62 | 3.83 | 0.00 | 3.20 | 3.40 |
| 10 | 1.70 | 1.58 | 1.66 | 1.49 | 2.24 | 1.86 | 3.82 | 5.77 | 3.20 | 0.00 | 5.04 |
| 11 | 5.31 | 5.17 | 5.27 | 5.03 | 5.43 | 5.27 | 3.34 | 2.31 | 3.40 | 5.04 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 0.76 |
| 2 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.78 |
| 3 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.75 |
| 4 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.88 | 0.97 | 0.77 |
| 5 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.93 | 0.78 |
| 6 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.76 |
| 7 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.80 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.83 |
| 9 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.80 |
| 10 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.75 |
| 11 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013