| Project Name | zz |
| Project Name | zz |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 194.2 | 144.0 | 142.9 | 142.9 | 139.9 | 138.1 | 134.2 | 113.6 | 106.0 | 105.6 | 94.2 | 83.8 |
| Cluster size | 235 | 195 | 203 | 188 | 195 | 165 | 180 | 137 | 150 | 132 | 126 | 94 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.89 | 2.67 | 2.68 | 2.78 | 2.59 | 2.55 | 2.65 | 7.25 | 3.24 | 2.48 | 2.30 | 2.81 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.95 | 2.03 | 1.77 | 1.89 | 2.42 | 1.84 | 7.16 | 2.68 | 2.04 | 2.50 | 2.49 |
| 2 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 2.07 | 1.97 | 2.07 | 2.09 | 7.37 | 2.41 | 2.03 | 2.43 | 2.33 |
| 3 | 2.03 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 1.87 | 2.11 | 2.14 | 7.14 | 2.53 | 2.04 | 2.34 | 2.14 |
| 4 | 1.77 | 2.07 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 1.92 | 2.39 | 1.83 | 7.26 | 2.67 | 1.99 | 2.29 | 2.43 |
| 5 | 1.89 | 1.97 | 1.87 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 2.01 | 7.33 | 2.49 | 1.87 | 2.28 | 2.28 |
| 6 | 2.42 | 2.07 | 2.11 | 2.39 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.44 | 7.25 | 2.21 | 2.37 | 2.43 | 2.09 |
| 7 | 1.84 | 2.09 | 2.14 | 1.83 | 2.01 | 2.44 | 0.00 | 7.16 | 3.00 | 1.88 | 2.18 | 2.64 |
| 8 | 7.16 | 7.37 | 7.14 | 7.26 | 7.33 | 7.25 | 7.16 | 0.00 | 7.64 | 7.21 | 7.14 | 7.44 |
| 9 | 2.68 | 2.41 | 2.53 | 2.67 | 2.49 | 2.21 | 3.00 | 7.64 | 0.00 | 2.79 | 3.25 | 2.01 |
| 10 | 2.04 | 2.03 | 2.04 | 1.99 | 1.87 | 2.37 | 1.88 | 7.21 | 2.79 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 2.51 |
| 11 | 2.50 | 2.43 | 2.34 | 2.29 | 2.28 | 2.43 | 2.18 | 7.14 | 3.25 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 2.92 |
| 12 | 2.49 | 2.33 | 2.14 | 2.43 | 2.28 | 2.09 | 2.64 | 7.44 | 2.01 | 2.51 | 2.92 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.70 |
| 2 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.71 |
| 3 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.75 |
| 4 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| 5 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| 7 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| 8 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| 9 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.77 |
| 10 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| 11 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.68 |
| 12 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013