| Project Name | Pkj_swiss_mbl3 |
| Project Name | Pkj_swiss_mbl3 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 142.9 | 141.4 | 134.5 | 127.8 | 126.7 | 119.1 | 118.9 | 112.8 | 93.8 | 91.4 | 64.9 | 31.2 |
| Cluster size | 212 | 217 | 208 | 213 | 201 | 173 | 175 | 173 | 168 | 140 | 83 | 37 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.51 | 6.05 | 5.66 | 5.92 | 6.78 | 5.08 | 5.78 | 4.19 | 6.18 | 4.95 | 3.65 | 3.87 |
| GDT_TS | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.65 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 2.36 | 2.71 | 3.45 | 2.17 | 2.58 | 1.99 | 3.11 | 2.13 | 2.32 | 1.91 |
| 2 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 2.21 | 2.45 | 1.97 | 2.81 | 2.40 | 3.29 | 1.98 | 2.28 | 4.00 | 3.63 |
| 3 | 2.36 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 2.76 | 2.50 | 2.63 | 3.25 | 2.78 | 2.15 | 3.54 | 3.30 |
| 4 | 2.71 | 2.45 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.03 | 1.89 | 3.11 | 2.69 | 2.37 | 3.97 | 3.36 |
| 5 | 3.45 | 1.97 | 2.76 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 3.16 | 2.58 | 4.10 | 1.81 | 2.82 | 4.72 | 4.32 |
| 6 | 2.17 | 2.81 | 2.50 | 2.03 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 2.04 | 2.32 | 2.83 | 2.32 | 2.98 | 2.61 |
| 7 | 2.58 | 2.40 | 2.63 | 1.89 | 2.58 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 2.88 | 2.23 | 2.35 | 3.82 | 3.26 |
| 8 | 1.99 | 3.29 | 3.25 | 3.11 | 4.10 | 2.32 | 2.88 | 0.00 | 3.51 | 2.63 | 2.12 | 2.16 |
| 9 | 3.11 | 1.98 | 2.78 | 2.69 | 1.81 | 2.83 | 2.23 | 3.51 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 4.23 | 3.89 |
| 10 | 2.13 | 2.28 | 2.15 | 2.37 | 2.82 | 2.32 | 2.35 | 2.63 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 3.23 | 2.74 |
| 11 | 2.32 | 4.00 | 3.54 | 3.97 | 4.72 | 2.98 | 3.82 | 2.12 | 4.23 | 3.23 | 0.00 | 2.46 |
| 12 | 1.91 | 3.63 | 3.30 | 3.36 | 4.32 | 2.61 | 3.26 | 2.16 | 3.89 | 2.74 | 2.46 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.79 |
| 2 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.67 |
| 3 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
| 4 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| 6 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.69 |
| 7 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.68 |
| 8 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
| 9 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.68 |
| 10 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| 11 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| 12 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013