| Project Name | Lysozyme |
| Project Name | Lysozyme |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 274.4 | 209.8 | 174.9 | 157.1 | 136.0 | 130.6 | 129.1 | 111.9 | 101.2 | 96.9 | 88.6 | 68.4 |
| Cluster size | 334 | 247 | 208 | 183 | 160 | 171 | 151 | 125 | 120 | 109 | 103 | 89 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.63 | 2.81 | 2.61 | 3.32 | 2.85 | 2.36 | 2.15 | 2.72 | 2.39 | 2.70 | 2.63 | 2.55 |
| GDT_TS | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.73 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.42 | 2.23 | 2.25 | 2.13 | 2.00 | 2.17 | 2.24 | 2.25 | 2.08 | 2.16 | 2.04 |
| 2 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 3.43 | 2.09 | 1.79 | 3.02 | 2.75 | 3.04 | 3.12 | 3.15 | 2.76 | 2.96 |
| 3 | 2.23 | 3.43 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 2.93 | 1.63 | 2.25 | 2.80 | 2.34 | 2.46 | 2.73 | 2.09 |
| 4 | 2.25 | 2.09 | 3.27 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 2.90 | 2.85 | 2.85 | 3.00 | 2.61 | 2.59 | 2.62 |
| 5 | 2.13 | 1.79 | 2.93 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 2.45 | 2.65 | 2.97 | 2.85 | 2.98 | 2.76 | 2.73 |
| 6 | 2.00 | 3.02 | 1.63 | 2.90 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 2.73 | 2.19 | 2.32 | 2.40 | 2.14 |
| 7 | 2.17 | 2.75 | 2.25 | 2.85 | 2.65 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 1.89 | 2.43 | 2.23 | 2.02 |
| 8 | 2.24 | 3.04 | 2.80 | 2.85 | 2.97 | 2.73 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 2.38 | 2.20 | 2.12 | 2.10 |
| 9 | 2.25 | 3.12 | 2.34 | 3.00 | 2.85 | 2.19 | 1.89 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 2.06 | 2.32 | 1.84 |
| 10 | 2.08 | 3.15 | 2.46 | 2.61 | 2.98 | 2.32 | 2.43 | 2.20 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 1.86 | 1.96 |
| 11 | 2.16 | 2.76 | 2.73 | 2.59 | 2.76 | 2.40 | 2.23 | 2.12 | 2.32 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 2.10 |
| 12 | 2.04 | 2.96 | 2.09 | 2.62 | 2.73 | 2.14 | 2.02 | 2.10 | 1.84 | 1.96 | 2.10 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.74 |
| 2 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.71 |
| 3 | 0.71 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.74 |
| 4 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.70 |
| 6 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.78 |
| 8 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.81 |
| 10 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| 11 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 |
| 12 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013