| Project Name | T45Acontrol/HIV-1 |
| Project Name | T45Acontrol/HIV-1 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 557.0 | 497.5 | 358.4 | 354.3 | 352.2 | 334.7 | 256.3 | 222.9 | 187.1 | 176.5 | 96.4 | 49.7 |
| Cluster size | 297 | 262 | 200 | 214 | 205 | 188 | 171 | 128 | 137 | 107 | 55 | 36 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.39 | 1.22 | 1.39 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.22 | 1.21 | 1.50 | 1.36 | 1.41 | 1.48 | 1.83 |
| GDT_TS | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.84 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.66 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.86 | 1.65 |
| 2 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.85 | 1.68 |
| 3 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.82 | 0.45 | 0.71 | 1.65 |
| 4 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.41 | 0.67 | 0.45 | 1.06 | 1.73 |
| 5 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.47 | 0.69 | 1.59 |
| 6 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.63 | 0.40 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 1.03 | 1.68 |
| 7 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.49 | 0.79 | 1.61 |
| 8 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.54 | 0.41 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.44 | 1.02 | 1.77 |
| 9 | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.51 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 1.11 | 1.71 |
| 10 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 1.78 |
| 11 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 1.06 | 0.69 | 1.03 | 0.79 | 1.02 | 1.11 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| 12 | 1.65 | 1.68 | 1.65 | 1.73 | 1.59 | 1.68 | 1.61 | 1.77 | 1.71 | 1.78 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| 3 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.95 |
| 4 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.93 |
| 5 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.96 |
| 6 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.92 | 0.93 |
| 7 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| 8 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.93 |
| 9 | 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
| 10 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.95 |
| 11 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.95 |
| 12 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013