| Project Name | CHEM361-G13M89 |
| Project Name | CHEM361-G13M89 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 219.7 | 160.8 | 137.3 | 128.3 | 98.1 | 75.7 | 61.8 | 52.5 | 48.0 | 47.9 | 38.4 | 32.9 |
| Cluster size | 371 | 257 | 283 | 233 | 139 | 118 | 127 | 103 | 73 | 143 | 103 | 50 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.7 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 1.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.81 | 4.45 | 5.21 | 4.71 | 4.65 | 5.35 | 5.45 | 4.42 | 5.03 | 5.95 | 5.41 | 4.97 |
| GDT_TS | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.52 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 2.25 | 4.31 | 2.88 | 4.53 | 1.96 | 5.56 | 2.67 | 1.18 | 4.03 | 3.47 |
| 2 | 3.41 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 3.29 | 1.49 | 3.25 | 2.73 | 4.73 | 2.92 | 3.24 | 3.47 | 2.57 |
| 3 | 2.25 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 3.93 | 1.50 | 3.77 | 1.76 | 5.47 | 2.34 | 2.06 | 4.01 | 2.58 |
| 4 | 4.31 | 3.29 | 3.93 | 0.00 | 3.93 | 2.09 | 3.96 | 2.86 | 4.54 | 3.94 | 1.92 | 4.45 |
| 5 | 2.88 | 1.49 | 1.50 | 3.93 | 0.00 | 3.90 | 2.33 | 5.42 | 2.38 | 2.72 | 4.07 | 2.27 |
| 6 | 4.53 | 3.25 | 3.77 | 2.09 | 3.90 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 3.39 | 4.77 | 4.10 | 2.54 | 4.61 |
| 7 | 1.96 | 2.73 | 1.76 | 3.96 | 2.33 | 3.80 | 0.00 | 5.14 | 2.84 | 1.96 | 3.72 | 3.10 |
| 8 | 5.56 | 4.73 | 5.47 | 2.86 | 5.42 | 3.39 | 5.14 | 0.00 | 5.81 | 5.46 | 3.54 | 5.80 |
| 9 | 2.67 | 2.92 | 2.34 | 4.54 | 2.38 | 4.77 | 2.84 | 5.81 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 4.17 | 1.51 |
| 10 | 1.18 | 3.24 | 2.06 | 3.94 | 2.72 | 4.10 | 1.96 | 5.46 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 3.76 | 3.17 |
| 11 | 4.03 | 3.47 | 4.01 | 1.92 | 4.07 | 2.54 | 3.72 | 3.54 | 4.17 | 3.76 | 0.00 | 4.21 |
| 12 | 3.47 | 2.57 | 2.58 | 4.45 | 2.27 | 4.61 | 3.10 | 5.80 | 1.51 | 3.17 | 4.21 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.83 | 0.49 | 0.71 | 0.91 | 0.62 | 0.63 |
| 2 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.61 | 0.86 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.80 |
| 3 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 0.58 | 0.83 | 0.44 | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.55 | 0.79 |
| 4 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.88 | 0.55 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.88 |
| 6 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.78 | 0.57 |
| 7 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.58 | 0.75 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 0.63 | 0.71 |
| 8 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.47 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.66 | 0.45 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.56 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.77 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.86 |
| 10 | 0.91 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.60 | 0.70 | 0.61 | 0.85 | 0.50 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.63 |
| 11 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 0.57 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.55 |
| 12 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 0.57 | 0.71 | 0.45 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013