| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 278.0 | 245.3 | 161.4 | 136.3 | 108.7 | 102.0 | 100.6 | 94.2 | 85.4 | 66.8 | 61.8 | 50.4 |
| Cluster size | 392 | 344 | 218 | 211 | 132 | 126 | 127 | 122 | 101 | 87 | 75 | 65 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.78 | 6.27 | 5.72 | 5.69 | 5.73 | 6.38 | 5.18 | 6.36 | 5.91 | 5.50 | 4.35 | 5.03 |
| GDT_TS | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.41 | 2.12 | 2.43 | 2.88 | 2.87 | 2.65 | 2.93 | 2.41 | 2.95 | 3.30 | 5.62 |
| 2 | 2.41 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 2.11 | 3.03 | 2.38 | 2.47 | 3.24 | 2.28 | 3.53 | 3.92 | 6.21 |
| 3 | 2.12 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 2.51 | 2.09 | 2.77 | 2.47 | 2.53 | 2.62 | 2.42 | 2.92 | 5.22 |
| 4 | 2.43 | 2.11 | 2.51 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 2.70 | 2.12 | 3.23 | 1.99 | 3.19 | 3.50 | 5.89 |
| 5 | 2.88 | 3.03 | 2.09 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 2.64 | 2.55 | 2.82 | 2.83 | 2.81 | 2.83 | 5.07 |
| 6 | 2.87 | 2.38 | 2.77 | 2.70 | 2.64 | 0.00 | 2.63 | 3.06 | 2.47 | 3.27 | 3.74 | 5.70 |
| 7 | 2.65 | 2.47 | 2.47 | 2.12 | 2.55 | 2.63 | 0.00 | 3.28 | 2.19 | 3.17 | 3.21 | 5.31 |
| 8 | 2.93 | 3.24 | 2.53 | 3.23 | 2.82 | 3.06 | 3.28 | 0.00 | 3.19 | 2.91 | 3.52 | 5.71 |
| 9 | 2.41 | 2.28 | 2.62 | 1.99 | 2.83 | 2.47 | 2.19 | 3.19 | 0.00 | 3.16 | 3.46 | 5.64 |
| 10 | 2.95 | 3.53 | 2.42 | 3.19 | 2.81 | 3.27 | 3.17 | 2.91 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 2.82 | 4.69 |
| 11 | 3.30 | 3.92 | 2.92 | 3.50 | 2.83 | 3.74 | 3.21 | 3.52 | 3.46 | 2.82 | 0.00 | 3.88 |
| 12 | 5.62 | 6.21 | 5.22 | 5.89 | 5.07 | 5.70 | 5.31 | 5.71 | 5.64 | 4.69 | 3.88 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.73 |
| 3 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| 4 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.70 |
| 5 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| 6 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.71 |
| 7 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| 8 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
| 9 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| 10 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.74 |
| 11 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013