Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 125.3 | 117.7 | 105.2 | 90.6 | 88.6 | 77.4 | 73.7 | 68.0 | 61.7 | 54.9 | 50.4 | 34.5 |
Cluster size | 270 | 257 | 223 | 191 | 187 | 175 | 150 | 126 | 128 | 119 | 96 | 78 |
Average cluster RMSD | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 2.3 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 7.17 | 6.80 | 7.08 | 6.47 | 6.27 | 6.90 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 5.64 | 5.89 | 6.66 | 5.42 |
GDT_TS | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.43 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 3.47 | 2.95 | 3.95 | 4.40 | 3.82 | 4.32 | 3.01 | 5.14 | 5.29 | 4.21 | 5.93 |
2 | 3.47 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 4.39 | 4.16 | 3.49 | 4.31 | 3.47 | 4.69 | 5.26 | 4.59 | 5.73 |
3 | 2.95 | 2.99 | 0.00 | 4.19 | 4.30 | 3.77 | 4.21 | 3.03 | 4.84 | 5.43 | 4.02 | 6.01 |
4 | 3.95 | 4.39 | 4.19 | 0.00 | 4.62 | 4.32 | 4.06 | 3.79 | 4.18 | 5.11 | 3.51 | 5.76 |
5 | 4.40 | 4.16 | 4.30 | 4.62 | 0.00 | 3.82 | 4.04 | 4.10 | 3.41 | 4.10 | 5.11 | 5.25 |
6 | 3.82 | 3.49 | 3.77 | 4.32 | 3.82 | 0.00 | 4.17 | 3.69 | 4.11 | 5.01 | 4.18 | 5.80 |
7 | 4.32 | 4.31 | 4.21 | 4.06 | 4.04 | 4.17 | 0.00 | 4.29 | 4.07 | 4.82 | 3.58 | 5.90 |
8 | 3.01 | 3.47 | 3.03 | 3.79 | 4.10 | 3.69 | 4.29 | 0.00 | 4.80 | 5.37 | 4.03 | 6.22 |
9 | 5.14 | 4.69 | 4.84 | 4.18 | 3.41 | 4.11 | 4.07 | 4.80 | 0.00 | 3.65 | 4.54 | 4.64 |
10 | 5.29 | 5.26 | 5.43 | 5.11 | 4.10 | 5.01 | 4.82 | 5.37 | 3.65 | 0.00 | 5.46 | 4.22 |
11 | 4.21 | 4.59 | 4.02 | 3.51 | 5.11 | 4.18 | 3.58 | 4.03 | 4.54 | 5.46 | 0.00 | 5.89 |
12 | 5.93 | 5.73 | 6.01 | 5.76 | 5.25 | 5.80 | 5.90 | 6.22 | 4.64 | 4.22 | 5.89 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.38 |
2 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.41 |
3 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.63 | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.48 | 0.38 |
4 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.59 | 0.39 |
5 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
6 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.41 | 0.50 | 0.39 |
7 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.56 | 0.44 |
8 | 0.64 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.37 |
9 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.48 |
10 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.41 | 0.53 |
11 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 1.00 | 0.41 |
12 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.41 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013