| Project Name | 222 |
| Project Name | 222 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 185.6 | 174.9 | 151.7 | 136.5 | 130.5 | 124.2 | 119.7 | 101.3 | 88.3 | 87.3 | 84.2 | 53.5 |
| Cluster size | 289 | 236 | 205 | 180 | 173 | 172 | 166 | 137 | 128 | 107 | 123 | 84 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.89 | 4.83 | 5.26 | 5.07 | 4.98 | 4.85 | 4.56 | 4.71 | 4.32 | 5.22 | 4.88 | 4.27 |
| GDT_TS | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.57 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.37 | 2.96 | 3.02 | 3.13 | 2.92 | 2.67 | 2.85 | 3.47 | 3.44 | 4.06 |
| 2 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 2.38 | 2.51 | 2.38 | 2.46 | 2.79 | 3.30 | 2.43 | 2.84 | 4.03 |
| 3 | 2.37 | 2.76 | 0.00 | 2.94 | 3.12 | 3.06 | 3.11 | 2.93 | 3.52 | 3.21 | 3.40 | 4.44 |
| 4 | 2.96 | 2.38 | 2.94 | 0.00 | 2.38 | 2.71 | 2.70 | 3.12 | 3.59 | 2.25 | 3.23 | 4.18 |
| 5 | 3.02 | 2.51 | 3.12 | 2.38 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 2.59 | 2.96 | 3.58 | 2.78 | 3.60 | 4.23 |
| 6 | 3.13 | 2.38 | 3.06 | 2.71 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 2.93 | 2.56 | 3.41 | 2.93 | 2.46 | 3.78 |
| 7 | 2.92 | 2.46 | 3.11 | 2.70 | 2.59 | 2.93 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 3.04 | 3.05 | 3.25 | 3.83 |
| 8 | 2.67 | 2.79 | 2.93 | 3.12 | 2.96 | 2.56 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 2.74 | 3.41 | 2.98 | 3.66 |
| 9 | 2.85 | 3.30 | 3.52 | 3.59 | 3.58 | 3.41 | 3.04 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 4.25 | 3.46 | 3.56 |
| 10 | 3.47 | 2.43 | 3.21 | 2.25 | 2.78 | 2.93 | 3.05 | 3.41 | 4.25 | 0.00 | 3.47 | 4.61 |
| 11 | 3.44 | 2.84 | 3.40 | 3.23 | 3.60 | 2.46 | 3.25 | 2.98 | 3.46 | 3.47 | 0.00 | 3.92 |
| 12 | 4.06 | 4.03 | 4.44 | 4.18 | 4.23 | 3.78 | 3.83 | 3.66 | 3.56 | 4.61 | 3.92 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.64 |
| 2 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.63 |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.61 |
| 4 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.63 |
| 5 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.62 |
| 6 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.65 |
| 8 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| 9 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.65 |
| 10 | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.63 |
| 11 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.68 |
| 12 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013