| Project Name | BhlakWt |
| Project Name | BhlakWt |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 252.3 | 179.9 | 159.8 | 152.4 | 149.0 | 146.2 | 132.2 | 116.2 | 105.8 | 93.5 | 93.1 | 91.1 |
| Cluster size | 305 | 214 | 183 | 190 | 185 | 177 | 148 | 155 | 124 | 111 | 101 | 107 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.61 | 2.54 | 2.38 | 2.34 | 2.39 | 2.26 | 2.29 | 2.31 | 2.50 | 2.32 | 2.39 | 2.27 |
| GDT_TS | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.33 | 1.90 | 2.02 | 2.38 | 2.34 | 2.27 | 2.63 | 2.08 | 1.87 | 2.36 | 1.93 |
| 2 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 2.19 | 2.49 | 2.30 | 1.84 | 2.50 | 1.94 | 2.16 | 1.84 | 2.39 |
| 3 | 1.90 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 2.29 | 2.18 | 1.99 | 2.44 | 1.81 | 2.06 | 1.74 | 2.27 |
| 4 | 2.02 | 2.19 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 2.17 | 2.12 | 2.50 | 2.12 | 1.71 | 2.20 | 2.04 |
| 5 | 2.38 | 2.49 | 2.29 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 1.89 | 2.39 | 2.33 | 2.45 | 2.16 | 2.55 | 2.31 |
| 6 | 2.34 | 2.30 | 2.18 | 2.17 | 1.89 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 2.02 | 2.32 | 2.08 | 2.14 | 2.13 |
| 7 | 2.27 | 1.84 | 1.99 | 2.12 | 2.39 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 2.43 | 1.87 | 1.99 | 1.94 | 2.24 |
| 8 | 2.63 | 2.50 | 2.44 | 2.50 | 2.33 | 2.02 | 2.43 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 2.51 | 2.43 | 2.32 |
| 9 | 2.08 | 1.94 | 1.81 | 2.12 | 2.45 | 2.32 | 1.87 | 2.54 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.04 | 2.37 |
| 10 | 1.87 | 2.16 | 2.06 | 1.71 | 2.16 | 2.08 | 1.99 | 2.51 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 1.90 |
| 11 | 2.36 | 1.84 | 1.74 | 2.20 | 2.55 | 2.14 | 1.94 | 2.43 | 2.04 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 2.42 |
| 12 | 1.93 | 2.39 | 2.27 | 2.04 | 2.31 | 2.13 | 2.24 | 2.32 | 2.37 | 1.90 | 2.42 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.75 |
| 2 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.70 |
| 3 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.71 |
| 5 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.72 |
| 6 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.75 |
| 7 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.70 |
| 8 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.71 |
| 9 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.71 |
| 10 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| 11 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
| 12 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013