| Project Name | 14CTB14 |
| Project Name | 14CTB14 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 141.1 | 90.1 | 65.0 | 63.9 | 62.4 | 60.6 | 49.9 | 49.3 | 45.9 | 45.5 | 36.7 | 35.6 |
| Cluster size | 293 | 241 | 177 | 201 | 191 | 160 | 111 | 154 | 123 | 117 | 124 | 108 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.1 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 3.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 8.68 | 11.50 | 11.60 | 11.30 | 10.50 | 12.00 | 7.25 | 12.50 | 7.87 | 9.77 | 12.60 | 7.48 |
| GDT_TS | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.46 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 7.38 | 6.87 | 5.99 | 4.31 | 7.16 | 6.24 | 7.93 | 3.31 | 4.06 | 9.11 | 4.22 |
| 2 | 7.38 | 0.00 | 2.69 | 3.53 | 4.77 | 3.45 | 8.48 | 2.63 | 8.37 | 5.69 | 4.06 | 8.01 |
| 3 | 6.87 | 2.69 | 0.00 | 2.90 | 4.03 | 3.04 | 8.51 | 3.05 | 7.94 | 4.99 | 4.09 | 7.91 |
| 4 | 5.99 | 3.53 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 3.17 | 2.92 | 8.49 | 4.06 | 7.40 | 4.68 | 5.10 | 7.72 |
| 5 | 4.31 | 4.77 | 4.03 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 4.22 | 7.98 | 5.18 | 5.86 | 3.68 | 6.14 | 6.17 |
| 6 | 7.16 | 3.45 | 3.04 | 2.92 | 4.22 | 0.00 | 9.55 | 3.54 | 8.64 | 5.69 | 4.25 | 8.82 |
| 7 | 6.24 | 8.48 | 8.51 | 8.49 | 7.98 | 9.55 | 0.00 | 9.59 | 4.94 | 6.62 | 10.10 | 5.05 |
| 8 | 7.93 | 2.63 | 3.05 | 4.06 | 5.18 | 3.54 | 9.59 | 0.00 | 9.18 | 5.88 | 4.27 | 8.83 |
| 9 | 3.31 | 8.37 | 7.94 | 7.40 | 5.86 | 8.64 | 4.94 | 9.18 | 0.00 | 4.85 | 10.10 | 3.37 |
| 10 | 4.06 | 5.69 | 4.99 | 4.68 | 3.68 | 5.69 | 6.62 | 5.88 | 4.85 | 0.00 | 7.24 | 5.51 |
| 11 | 9.11 | 4.06 | 4.09 | 5.10 | 6.14 | 4.25 | 10.10 | 4.27 | 10.10 | 7.24 | 0.00 | 9.70 |
| 12 | 4.22 | 8.01 | 7.91 | 7.72 | 6.17 | 8.82 | 5.05 | 8.83 | 3.37 | 5.51 | 9.70 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.61 |
| 2 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.59 |
| 3 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.63 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.61 |
| 4 | 0.57 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.53 |
| 5 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.55 |
| 6 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.57 |
| 7 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.57 |
| 8 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.56 |
| 9 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.67 |
| 10 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.56 |
| 11 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.55 |
| 12 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013