| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 355.7 | 312.5 | 297.1 | 287.0 | 252.1 | 190.9 | 190.9 | 155.8 | 131.2 | 122.8 | 105.9 | 20.1 |
| Cluster size | 295 | 265 | 239 | 242 | 193 | 165 | 164 | 123 | 88 | 120 | 91 | 15 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 2.78 | 2.50 | 2.62 | 2.81 | 2.64 | 2.58 | 2.24 | 2.57 | 3.01 | 2.15 | 2.84 | 2.73 |
| GDT_TS | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.71 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 1.94 | 1.68 | 1.60 | 1.77 | 1.51 | 1.17 | 1.51 | 1.86 | 1.82 | 2.05 |
| 2 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.86 | 1.49 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 1.67 | 1.59 | 1.70 | 1.90 | 1.43 | 1.93 |
| 3 | 1.94 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 1.51 | 1.78 | 1.81 | 1.79 | 2.00 | 2.04 | 1.80 | 1.79 | 1.29 |
| 4 | 1.68 | 1.49 | 1.51 | 0.00 | 1.31 | 1.51 | 1.78 | 1.78 | 1.74 | 2.07 | 1.37 | 1.61 |
| 5 | 1.60 | 1.20 | 1.78 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.24 | 1.71 | 1.61 | 1.61 | 2.00 | 1.42 | 1.94 |
| 6 | 1.77 | 1.30 | 1.81 | 1.51 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.87 | 1.80 | 1.67 | 2.09 | 1.23 | 2.02 |
| 7 | 1.51 | 1.67 | 1.79 | 1.78 | 1.71 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 1.41 | 1.94 | 1.33 | 1.88 | 2.00 |
| 8 | 1.17 | 1.59 | 2.00 | 1.78 | 1.61 | 1.80 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 1.60 | 1.89 | 1.86 | 2.03 |
| 9 | 1.51 | 1.70 | 2.04 | 1.74 | 1.61 | 1.67 | 1.94 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 1.81 | 2.11 |
| 10 | 1.86 | 1.90 | 1.80 | 2.07 | 2.00 | 2.09 | 1.33 | 1.89 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 1.93 |
| 11 | 1.82 | 1.43 | 1.79 | 1.37 | 1.42 | 1.23 | 1.88 | 1.86 | 1.81 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 1.92 |
| 12 | 2.05 | 1.93 | 1.29 | 1.61 | 1.94 | 2.02 | 2.00 | 2.03 | 2.11 | 1.93 | 1.92 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.73 |
| 2 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.88 | 0.77 |
| 3 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.88 |
| 4 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.89 | 0.82 |
| 5 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.78 |
| 6 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.91 | 0.80 |
| 7 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.76 |
| 8 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.73 |
| 9 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.76 |
| 10 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.77 |
| 11 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| 12 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013