| Project Name | ATOX |
| Project Name | ATOX |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 219.5 | 172.5 | 171.4 | 169.4 | 167.7 | 156.0 | 155.7 | 154.9 | 154.2 | 147.1 | 139.0 | 137.2 |
| Cluster size | 226 | 179 | 183 | 175 | 169 | 146 | 173 | 156 | 153 | 155 | 144 | 141 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 1.90 | 1.46 | 1.77 | 1.85 | 1.71 | 1.84 | 1.98 | 1.63 | 2.05 | 1.86 | 1.56 | 1.30 |
| GDT_TS | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.88 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.43 | 1.02 | 1.25 | 1.17 | 1.22 | 1.34 | 1.52 | 1.12 | 1.15 | 1.64 | 1.52 |
| 2 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.28 | 1.19 | 1.49 | 1.48 | 1.53 | 1.25 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.26 | 1.02 |
| 3 | 1.02 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 1.02 | 1.44 | 1.20 | 1.31 | 1.33 | 1.00 | 1.27 | 1.43 | 1.37 |
| 4 | 1.25 | 1.19 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.57 | 1.45 | 1.38 | 1.51 | 1.11 | 1.31 | 1.46 | 1.40 |
| 5 | 1.17 | 1.49 | 1.44 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.35 | 1.66 | 1.53 | 1.47 | 1.33 | 1.71 | 1.47 |
| 6 | 1.22 | 1.48 | 1.20 | 1.45 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.48 | 1.25 | 1.24 | 1.37 | 1.67 | 1.48 |
| 7 | 1.34 | 1.53 | 1.31 | 1.38 | 1.66 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 1.49 | 1.47 | 1.62 | 1.60 | 1.56 |
| 8 | 1.52 | 1.25 | 1.33 | 1.51 | 1.53 | 1.25 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.53 | 1.41 | 1.25 | 1.32 |
| 9 | 1.12 | 1.40 | 1.00 | 1.11 | 1.47 | 1.24 | 1.47 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.19 | 1.62 | 1.64 |
| 10 | 1.15 | 1.40 | 1.27 | 1.31 | 1.33 | 1.37 | 1.62 | 1.41 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.71 | 1.63 |
| 11 | 1.64 | 1.26 | 1.43 | 1.46 | 1.71 | 1.67 | 1.60 | 1.25 | 1.62 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| 12 | 1.52 | 1.02 | 1.37 | 1.40 | 1.47 | 1.48 | 1.56 | 1.32 | 1.64 | 1.63 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.82 |
| 2 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.93 |
| 3 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.85 |
| 4 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.84 |
| 5 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.87 |
| 6 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.84 |
| 7 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.84 |
| 8 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.86 |
| 9 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.81 |
| 10 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.81 |
| 11 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.86 |
| 12 | 0.82 | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013