Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 211.5 | 153.1 | 150.2 | 133.8 | 128.7 | 102.7 | 99.6 | 94.1 | 89.0 | 86.3 | 78.7 | 72.7 |
Cluster size | 325 | 228 | 203 | 195 | 178 | 144 | 147 | 124 | 120 | 140 | 114 | 82 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.1 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 2.83 | 2.98 | 2.50 | 2.93 | 3.18 | 3.06 | 2.79 | 3.24 | 3.04 | 3.23 | 2.55 | 3.47 |
GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.64 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 2.13 | 1.94 | 2.13 | 2.00 | 1.32 | 2.22 | 2.24 | 1.97 | 2.42 | 2.21 |
2 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 2.03 | 2.17 | 2.15 | 1.90 | 2.13 | 2.10 | 1.89 | 2.36 | 1.87 |
3 | 2.13 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.32 | 2.25 | 2.33 | 2.04 | 2.42 | 2.16 | 2.26 | 2.34 | 2.69 |
4 | 1.94 | 2.03 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 1.86 | 2.07 | 1.93 | 2.24 | 2.46 | 2.06 | 2.38 | 2.15 |
5 | 2.13 | 2.17 | 2.25 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 1.97 | 2.01 | 2.28 | 2.41 | 1.92 | 2.46 | 2.19 |
6 | 2.00 | 2.15 | 2.33 | 2.07 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 2.20 | 2.43 | 2.26 | 2.66 | 2.48 |
7 | 1.32 | 1.90 | 2.04 | 1.93 | 2.01 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 2.27 | 2.35 | 1.96 | 2.40 | 2.33 |
8 | 2.22 | 2.13 | 2.42 | 2.24 | 2.28 | 2.20 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 2.72 | 2.32 | 2.65 | 2.57 |
9 | 2.24 | 2.10 | 2.16 | 2.46 | 2.41 | 2.43 | 2.35 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 2.15 | 2.72 | 2.22 |
10 | 1.97 | 1.89 | 2.26 | 2.06 | 1.92 | 2.26 | 1.96 | 2.32 | 2.15 | 0.00 | 2.36 | 2.00 |
11 | 2.42 | 2.36 | 2.34 | 2.38 | 2.46 | 2.66 | 2.40 | 2.65 | 2.72 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 2.53 |
12 | 2.21 | 1.87 | 2.69 | 2.15 | 2.19 | 2.48 | 2.33 | 2.57 | 2.22 | 2.00 | 2.53 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.73 |
2 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.78 |
3 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.68 |
4 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.73 |
5 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.75 |
6 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.70 |
7 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 |
8 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.67 |
9 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 0.78 |
10 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.74 |
11 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
12 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013