Project Name |
Project Name |
Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Cluster density | 192.3 | 187.7 | 129.1 | 115.4 | 112.8 | 103.5 | 102.5 | 99.2 | 92.6 | 88.9 | 79.4 | 65.6 |
Cluster size | 296 | 269 | 185 | 175 | 164 | 153 | 140 | 146 | 134 | 132 | 113 | 93 |
Average cluster RMSD | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
RMSD | 4.37 | 12.40 | 6.53 | 7.77 | 4.19 | 4.19 | 7.42 | 6.62 | 3.64 | 3.97 | 6.69 | 5.88 |
GDT_TS | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.41 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 0.00 | 12.90 | 6.57 | 8.66 | 3.73 | 4.15 | 8.62 | 8.20 | 3.68 | 3.33 | 6.35 | 4.68 |
2 | 12.90 | 0.00 | 13.40 | 13.10 | 12.10 | 13.10 | 14.90 | 13.80 | 12.40 | 12.00 | 12.70 | 12.40 |
3 | 6.57 | 13.40 | 0.00 | 7.23 | 5.34 | 5.64 | 7.44 | 7.20 | 6.82 | 6.53 | 9.34 | 7.84 |
4 | 8.66 | 13.10 | 7.23 | 0.00 | 7.80 | 7.25 | 6.82 | 5.89 | 8.32 | 8.31 | 10.60 | 9.85 |
5 | 3.73 | 12.10 | 5.34 | 7.80 | 0.00 | 3.50 | 7.65 | 7.11 | 3.84 | 3.25 | 6.95 | 5.06 |
6 | 4.15 | 13.10 | 5.64 | 7.25 | 3.50 | 0.00 | 6.82 | 6.14 | 4.55 | 4.44 | 7.97 | 6.18 |
7 | 8.62 | 14.90 | 7.44 | 6.82 | 7.65 | 6.82 | 0.00 | 3.20 | 8.49 | 8.50 | 11.30 | 9.97 |
8 | 8.20 | 13.80 | 7.20 | 5.89 | 7.11 | 6.14 | 3.20 | 0.00 | 7.69 | 7.85 | 10.60 | 9.59 |
9 | 3.68 | 12.40 | 6.82 | 8.32 | 3.84 | 4.55 | 8.49 | 7.69 | 0.00 | 3.14 | 5.42 | 4.84 |
10 | 3.33 | 12.00 | 6.53 | 8.31 | 3.25 | 4.44 | 8.50 | 7.85 | 3.14 | 0.00 | 5.88 | 4.02 |
11 | 6.35 | 12.70 | 9.34 | 10.60 | 6.95 | 7.97 | 11.30 | 10.60 | 5.42 | 5.88 | 0.00 | 4.85 |
12 | 4.68 | 12.40 | 7.84 | 9.85 | 5.06 | 6.18 | 9.97 | 9.59 | 4.84 | 4.02 | 4.85 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
1 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.48 |
2 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.44 |
3 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.45 |
4 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.45 | 0.49 |
5 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.44 | 0.50 |
6 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.47 |
7 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.45 |
8 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.44 |
9 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.47 |
10 | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.60 | 1.00 | 0.47 | 0.57 |
11 | 0.42 | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 0.45 |
12 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013