| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 214.5 | 209.2 | 203.0 | 146.0 | 129.4 | 127.4 | 126.2 | 119.0 | 118.3 | 101.0 | 87.3 | 52.1 |
| Cluster size | 262 | 264 | 256 | 173 | 163 | 154 | 164 | 125 | 155 | 121 | 101 | 62 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 6.51 | 6.84 | 6.44 | 6.45 | 6.94 | 7.32 | 5.71 | 6.00 | 6.90 | 6.13 | 5.69 | 5.77 |
| GDT_TS | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.66 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 2.59 | 2.55 | 2.45 | 2.41 | 2.58 | 1.70 | 1.99 | 2.70 | 2.79 | 2.97 |
| 2 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 2.92 | 2.36 | 2.22 | 3.17 | 2.65 | 1.75 | 3.29 | 2.79 | 3.35 |
| 3 | 2.59 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 2.16 | 2.02 | 2.49 | 2.57 | 2.67 | 2.41 | 3.24 | 2.71 | 2.84 |
| 4 | 2.55 | 2.92 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 2.73 | 3.12 | 2.14 | 2.54 | 2.77 | 2.38 | 3.16 | 2.45 |
| 5 | 2.45 | 2.36 | 2.02 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 3.12 | 2.62 | 2.03 | 3.57 | 2.70 | 3.35 |
| 6 | 2.41 | 2.22 | 2.49 | 3.12 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 3.42 | 2.92 | 1.98 | 3.74 | 2.95 | 3.64 |
| 7 | 2.58 | 3.17 | 2.57 | 2.14 | 3.12 | 3.42 | 0.00 | 2.35 | 2.92 | 2.45 | 2.96 | 2.57 |
| 8 | 1.70 | 2.65 | 2.67 | 2.54 | 2.62 | 2.92 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 2.47 | 2.90 | 2.76 |
| 9 | 1.99 | 1.75 | 2.41 | 2.77 | 2.03 | 1.98 | 2.92 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 3.14 | 2.63 | 3.11 |
| 10 | 2.70 | 3.29 | 3.24 | 2.38 | 3.57 | 3.74 | 2.45 | 2.47 | 3.14 | 0.00 | 3.69 | 2.57 |
| 11 | 2.79 | 2.79 | 2.71 | 3.16 | 2.70 | 2.95 | 2.96 | 2.90 | 2.63 | 3.69 | 0.00 | 3.05 |
| 12 | 2.97 | 3.35 | 2.84 | 2.45 | 3.35 | 3.64 | 2.57 | 2.76 | 3.11 | 2.57 | 3.05 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.70 |
| 2 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
| 3 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.70 |
| 4 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| 5 | 0.78 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.68 |
| 6 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.67 |
| 7 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| 8 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.72 |
| 9 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.70 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.77 |
| 11 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.69 |
| 12 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013