| Project Name | mutation153 |
| Project Name | mutation153 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 268.4 | 241.3 | 147.6 | 136.8 | 131.5 | 129.1 | 116.8 | 95.5 | 82.4 | 74.4 | 73.3 | 48.2 |
| Cluster size | 319 | 259 | 305 | 171 | 178 | 137 | 111 | 111 | 100 | 110 | 99 | 100 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 1.2 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 2.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.07 | 4.23 | 4.32 | 4.22 | 4.76 | 5.44 | 5.41 | 4.13 | 3.86 | 4.64 | 5.32 | 5.20 |
| GDT_TS | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.55 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.16 | 3.57 | 3.62 | 2.42 | 2.66 | 2.69 | 3.75 | 3.32 | 2.75 | 1.14 | 1.74 |
| 2 | 3.16 | 0.00 | 3.65 | 2.21 | 2.06 | 3.17 | 2.54 | 2.08 | 1.77 | 3.48 | 3.38 | 2.68 |
| 3 | 3.57 | 3.65 | 0.00 | 4.02 | 3.23 | 3.01 | 4.03 | 4.45 | 3.25 | 1.78 | 3.48 | 2.96 |
| 4 | 3.62 | 2.21 | 4.02 | 0.00 | 2.47 | 3.72 | 3.16 | 1.63 | 1.33 | 3.86 | 3.82 | 3.33 |
| 5 | 2.42 | 2.06 | 3.23 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 1.83 | 2.97 | 1.94 | 3.08 | 2.54 | 1.85 |
| 6 | 2.66 | 3.17 | 3.01 | 3.72 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 2.49 | 4.21 | 3.07 | 2.55 | 2.72 | 2.04 |
| 7 | 2.69 | 2.54 | 4.03 | 3.16 | 1.83 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 2.80 | 3.81 | 2.93 | 2.07 |
| 8 | 3.75 | 2.08 | 4.45 | 1.63 | 2.97 | 4.21 | 3.41 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 4.27 | 4.01 | 3.69 |
| 9 | 3.32 | 1.77 | 3.25 | 1.33 | 1.94 | 3.07 | 2.80 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 3.24 | 3.51 | 2.86 |
| 10 | 2.75 | 3.48 | 1.78 | 3.86 | 3.08 | 2.55 | 3.81 | 4.27 | 3.24 | 0.00 | 2.75 | 2.45 |
| 11 | 1.14 | 3.38 | 3.48 | 3.82 | 2.54 | 2.72 | 2.93 | 4.01 | 3.51 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| 12 | 1.74 | 2.68 | 2.96 | 3.33 | 1.85 | 2.04 | 2.07 | 3.69 | 2.86 | 2.45 | 1.79 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| 2 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.58 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.80 |
| 3 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 0.72 |
| 4 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.65 |
| 5 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.86 | 0.83 |
| 6 | 0.83 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.88 |
| 7 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.76 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.76 | 0.82 |
| 8 | 0.67 | 0.82 | 0.61 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.68 |
| 9 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.79 | 0.76 |
| 10 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| 11 | 0.94 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.84 |
| 12 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013