| Project Name | MUT_6 |
| Project Name | MUT_6 |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 126.3 | 105.7 | 83.6 | 74.5 | 63.4 | 58.6 | 47.0 | 44.5 | 44.0 | 41.1 | 37.5 | 34.5 |
| Cluster size | 320 | 271 | 234 | 181 | 177 | 174 | 137 | 83 | 108 | 98 | 111 | 106 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 3.1 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 5.03 | 3.41 | 5.04 | 3.81 | 5.41 | 5.51 | 5.54 | 6.99 | 6.29 | 3.71 | 5.60 | 5.40 |
| GDT_TS | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.53 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 2.12 | 3.29 | 2.10 | 2.05 | 2.21 | 5.13 | 4.74 | 3.89 | 3.69 | 2.84 |
| 2 | 3.61 | 0.00 | 3.42 | 1.78 | 3.87 | 4.13 | 4.19 | 6.13 | 5.86 | 1.38 | 4.54 | 4.37 |
| 3 | 2.12 | 3.42 | 0.00 | 3.56 | 2.34 | 2.73 | 2.41 | 4.89 | 4.46 | 3.75 | 4.15 | 3.48 |
| 4 | 3.29 | 1.78 | 3.56 | 0.00 | 3.92 | 4.03 | 4.06 | 6.25 | 6.13 | 1.55 | 4.42 | 4.09 |
| 5 | 2.10 | 3.87 | 2.34 | 3.92 | 0.00 | 1.49 | 1.62 | 3.82 | 4.00 | 4.36 | 3.08 | 2.40 |
| 6 | 2.05 | 4.13 | 2.73 | 4.03 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.67 | 4.05 | 3.91 | 4.63 | 2.96 | 2.30 |
| 7 | 2.21 | 4.19 | 2.41 | 4.06 | 1.62 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 3.55 | 4.70 | 3.15 | 2.34 |
| 8 | 5.13 | 6.13 | 4.89 | 6.25 | 3.82 | 4.05 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2.42 | 6.59 | 3.89 | 4.12 |
| 9 | 4.74 | 5.86 | 4.46 | 6.13 | 4.00 | 3.91 | 3.55 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 6.21 | 3.94 | 3.99 |
| 10 | 3.89 | 1.38 | 3.75 | 1.55 | 4.36 | 4.63 | 4.70 | 6.59 | 6.21 | 0.00 | 4.96 | 4.75 |
| 11 | 3.69 | 4.54 | 4.15 | 4.42 | 3.08 | 2.96 | 3.15 | 3.89 | 3.94 | 4.96 | 0.00 | 2.21 |
| 12 | 2.84 | 4.37 | 3.48 | 4.09 | 2.40 | 2.30 | 2.34 | 4.12 | 3.99 | 4.75 | 2.21 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.67 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.82 |
| 2 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.72 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 3 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.75 |
| 4 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.90 | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| 5 | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.92 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.76 |
| 6 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.82 |
| 7 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.79 |
| 8 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.67 |
| 9 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| 10 | 0.71 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.90 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.73 |
| 11 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| 12 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013