| Project Name |
| Project Name |
| Cluster # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Cluster density | 155.0 | 119.5 | 114.3 | 108.3 | 78.5 | 77.7 | 54.0 | 50.8 | 50.4 | 47.2 | 45.6 | 41.9 |
| Cluster size | 315 | 255 | 245 | 230 | 156 | 177 | 125 | 109 | 97 | 94 | 91 | 106 |
| Average cluster RMSD | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| RMSD | 4.91 | 4.59 | 4.76 | 4.56 | 4.90 | 4.62 | 4.21 | 5.15 | 3.18 | 3.10 | 2.99 | 2.86 |
| GDT_TS | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.65 |
The table contains RMSD and GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models and the input structure. Note that GDT_TS metric is intended as a more accurate measurement than the more common RMSD.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 2.79 | 2.94 | 2.50 | 2.81 | 3.53 | 2.81 | 3.89 | 4.55 | 4.85 | 4.38 |
| 2 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 2.41 | 2.22 | 2.84 | 3.39 | 2.80 | 3.67 | 4.13 | 4.54 | 3.95 |
| 3 | 2.79 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 2.81 | 3.14 | 2.63 | 2.98 | 2.47 | 4.14 | 4.01 | 5.12 | 4.14 |
| 4 | 2.94 | 2.41 | 2.81 | 0.00 | 3.17 | 3.06 | 3.19 | 3.08 | 4.00 | 4.28 | 4.92 | 4.03 |
| 5 | 2.50 | 2.22 | 3.14 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 3.45 | 3.86 | 3.21 | 3.90 | 4.75 | 4.62 | 4.20 |
| 6 | 2.81 | 2.84 | 2.63 | 3.06 | 3.45 | 0.00 | 3.23 | 2.59 | 4.23 | 3.82 | 4.88 | 4.12 |
| 7 | 3.53 | 3.39 | 2.98 | 3.19 | 3.86 | 3.23 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 3.75 | 3.71 | 4.53 | 3.58 |
| 8 | 2.81 | 2.80 | 2.47 | 3.08 | 3.21 | 2.59 | 3.41 | 0.00 | 4.56 | 4.34 | 5.32 | 4.50 |
| 9 | 3.89 | 3.67 | 4.14 | 4.00 | 3.90 | 4.23 | 3.75 | 4.56 | 0.00 | 3.29 | 2.98 | 2.59 |
| 10 | 4.55 | 4.13 | 4.01 | 4.28 | 4.75 | 3.82 | 3.71 | 4.34 | 3.29 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 2.79 |
| 11 | 4.85 | 4.54 | 5.12 | 4.92 | 4.62 | 4.88 | 4.53 | 5.32 | 2.98 | 2.91 | 0.00 | 2.92 |
| 12 | 4.38 | 3.95 | 4.14 | 4.03 | 4.20 | 4.12 | 3.58 | 4.50 | 2.59 | 2.79 | 2.92 | 0.00 |
The table contains RMSD values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) measure.
| # | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.60 |
| 2 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| 3 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.65 |
| 4 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.68 |
| 5 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.64 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.61 |
| 7 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.65 |
| 8 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.64 |
| 9 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.70 |
| 10 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| 11 | 0.66 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.68 |
| 12 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.00 |
The table contains GDT_TS values (calculated on the Cα atoms) between the predicted models.
Read more about the global distance test (GDT, also written as GDT_TS to represent "total score") measure.
© Laboratory of Theory of Biopolymers, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw 2013